BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 215clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai894Delhi709Chennai297Bangalore210Ahmedabad128Kolkata122Jaipur100Agra78Hyderabad74Chandigarh57Pune39Indore32Surat31Raipur31Rajkot28Visakhapatnam20Lucknow17Karnataka15Panaji11Jabalpur10Cochin9Jodhpur9Amritsar8SC8Cuttack8Guwahati6Telangana4Dehradun3Allahabad3Varanasi2Himachal Pradesh1Nagpur1Orissa1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Patna1Calcutta1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 2605Section 693Section 403Addition to Income3Section 133A2Deduction2Survey u/s 133A2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

ITTA/209/2010HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194JSection 260Section 40

disallowed on account of operation management service charges. 6. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal was filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax. The appeal was dismissed. The same was challenged before the Tribunal. The Tribunal relied on the earlier judgment of the High Court of Bombay as well as the judgment of this Court in the case of COMMISSIONER

The Commissioner of Income Tax - Central vs. M/s. Himagiri Biotech Pvt. Ltd.,

ITTA/526/2013HC Telangana30 Oct 2013
Section 36

disallowance can be made.” 9. It is argued by the revenue that ITAT has failed to appreciate that for the claim of interest, it is necessary that, firstly, the money ITA Nos.512/2013, 516/2013, 517/2013, 518/2013, 519/2013 & 526/2013 Page 10 must have been borrowed by the assessee, secondly, it must have been borrowed for the purpose of business and thirdly

M/S.VISWARUPA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS(P)LTD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/152/2005HC Telangana22 Nov 2017

Bench: This Court As Arising From The Impugned Order Of The Itat Read As Under:

Section 133ASection 142Section 158BSection 69

215/- The returns of Ram Ratan Bank, HUF and Bhagawat Devi Banka for AY 2001-02 were also examined and the cash balance with the two of them worked out Rs.10,48,231/-. Since this was not disclosed before IT authorities, Section 69A of the IT Act was invoked only as regards this amount and the disallowance

Kuchipudi Krishna Kishore vs. The DCIT

Accordingly the appeals deserves to be allowed by setting aside the impugned

ITTA/291/2007HC Telangana03 May 2024

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,N.TUKARAMJI

For Appellant: SRI A.V.A. SIVA KARTIKEYA on behalf ofFor Respondent: SRI ARVIND rep Ms. SUNDARI R PISUPATI
Section 260

215 t Dcr 2 (1) Hyd/ crr (A) llY 04-05 preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome tax, Circle-2 (1), Hyderabad dated31-12-20O4 in pAN/ G tR No. ADOPK9347 BtK-711 Between: Kuchipudi^Krishna _Kishore, S/o.K.Venkateswara Rao R/o.Flat No.101, padmaja Courts-ll, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT' AND The DCIT, Ct-2(1), Hyderabad