Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Dr. T.Ravi Kumar,
ITTA/102/2012HC Telangana24 Jul 2013
Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 10Th April, 2024. Appearance: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate Mr. Sanjay Bhowmick, Advocate Ms. Swapna Das, Advocate … For The Appellant. Ms. Smita Das De, Advocate … For The Respondent. 1. Heard Sri J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Sanjay Bhowmick, Learned Counsel For The Appellant/Assessee & Ms. Smita Das De, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Respondent. 2. The Assessment Years Involved In The Present Appeal Are Assessment Year 1999-2000 & Assessment Year 2000-01. By Order Dated 16.08.2012, This Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law :-
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 24(1)(i)Section 32Section 43B
disallowing 50% depreciation is in conflict
11
with the provisions of Section 32 of the Act read with Rule 5 of the
Income Tax Rules, 1962.
10. Learned counsel for the respondent has supported the impugned order
of the ITAT.
Decision and Findings
11. We have carefully considered the submissions of the parties and
perused the paper book.
Substantial Question
