Search: disallowance

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 155clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80M5 Section 373 Section 272 Section 252 Section 1152 Addition to Income2

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. J Charan Kumar [HUF]

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/211/2017HC Telangana17 Apr 2017

Bench: J. UMA DEVI,V RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Section 260ASection 37

disallowed in terms contemplated by Explanation 1 forming part of Section 37. 21. Appearing for the respondent assessee, Mr. Vohra, learned senior counsel submitted that it would be wholly incorrect to view the Bar Council of India Rules as amounting to a prohibition imposed by law and thus fall within the ken of Explanation 1. Mr. Vohra submitted that

COMMR OF INCOME TAX HYD vs. M/S.TAHER ENGG CORP. SECBAD

ITTA/85/2002HC Telangana03 Feb 2012

Bench: The Commissioner (Appeals). Through Order, Dated 04.12.1991, The Commissioner Allowed The Appeal & It Was Held That The Applicant Is Entitled To Treat The Unabsorbed Depreciation As Loss. Thereupon, The Department Carried The Matter In Appeal By Filing Ita.No.728/Hyd/1992 Before The Tribunal. The Tribunal Allowed The Appeal Through Its Order, Dated 28.08.1995 & Took The View That The Unabsorbed Depreciation Cannot Be Treated As Loss For The Purpose Of Section 115-J Of The Act.

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. J Charan Kumar [HUF]

COMMR OF INCOME TAX HYD vs. M/S.TAHER ENGG CORP. SECBAD

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. J Charan Kumar [HUF]

COMMR OF INCOME TAX HYD vs. M/S.TAHER ENGG CORP. SECBAD

COMMR.OF I.T. A.P.I HYD vs. DIAMOND HATCHERIES (P) LTD

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K. V. Srinivasa Rao

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M.Venkata Krishna Mohan