BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Bogus Purchasesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,199Delhi1,943Kolkata809Chennai492Ahmedabad363Jaipur322Bangalore304Surat290Chandigarh167Pune136Indore127Hyderabad112Raipur96Amritsar90Nagpur76Lucknow66Rajkot64Cochin59Calcutta52Guwahati51Visakhapatnam47Allahabad31Agra28Jodhpur26Cuttack24Ranchi17Karnataka13Dehradun12Patna12Jabalpur4Telangana4SC3Orissa3Panaji2Varanasi1Bombay1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income4Section 260A3Penny Stock2Disallowance2

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri Byru Venkateswarlu

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/341/2005HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 271(1)(c)

Bogus Purchase Rs.1,71,917/- 2-9 Salarly to Babu Bhai Rs.10,800/- 14 Disallowance of Dalali Rs.2,136/- 15” 6. Counsel

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

bogus payment shown by the assessee to M/s. Mrigiya Electronics Industries Private Limited for purchasing land of Rs.4,35,60,000/- for Rs.11,95,27,000/- without any justification for the same. ii. Whether the tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.15,19,340/- being commission paid by it to M/s. Mrigiya Electronics Industries Private Limited for giving

The Pr. Commissioner of income Tax-4 vs. M/s. Pavani Structurals Pvt. Ltd.

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITTA/96/2025HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: :

Section 260A

disallowance made by the Assessing Officer on account of Bogus Loss from share transaction amounting to Rs.71,38,200/- from the scrip of “First Financial Services Ltd.” was 2 justified in view of the fact that the said company was in the list of entities involved in doing suspicious transaction in penny stocks and that the assessee, who was specialized

AVANTI FEEDS LTD., vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

The appeal is dismissed, and the stay petition

ITTA/56/2011HC Telangana06 Jan 2026

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

Section 260A

purchase and sale 2 of penny stocks i.e. BLUE CIRCLE & CCL INTERNATIONAL featuring in the list of ‘Bogus Capital Loss Claims’ information data provided by the Directorate of Investigation, Kolkata? ii. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned Tribunal was justified in law in allowing the appeal of the assessee and deleting the disallowance