BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi491Mumbai473Bangalore214Chennai134Kolkata124Jaipur120Ahmedabad68Amritsar42Hyderabad39Chandigarh39Pune32Indore30Raipur24Nagpur21Cochin21Guwahati21Karnataka19Cuttack15Lucknow14Surat10SC8Allahabad8Patna7Varanasi5Agra4Jodhpur4Rajkot4Ranchi4Telangana4Jabalpur2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Visakhapatnam1Panaji1Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 1443Addition to Income3Section 2602

The Comissioner of Income Tax III, vs. Smt. Shanti Singh,

ITTA/51/2007HC Telangana15 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 132(1)Section 143Section 144Section 147Section 158

income had been clause (c) of section 158BC, on ssment. of determination of undisclosed oss of each previous year shall, gregation, be taken as the total puted in accordance with the t] without giving effect to set off losses under Chapter VI or tion under sub-section (2) of computing deductions under urposes of the said aggregation

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V vs. Smt.R.Amala Devi

ITTA/15/2009HC Telangana15 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 260A

undisclosed investment by passing a non speaking order. C. Whether Hon’ble ITAT erred in law in upholding the addition on account of “Addition to fixed assets” when such assets are appearing in the balance sheet. D. Whether the order passed by Hon’ble Tribunal is in accordance with law. 3. The appellant is a partnership firm against whom

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II vs. M/S.TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA

In the result, we set aside the assessment orders, except to

ITTA/133/2014HC Telangana03 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

For Appellant: --------------------------------------------------------For Respondent: ------------------------------------------------------
Section 11Section 132Section 44Section 44A

undisclosed investment and disallowed depreciation I.T.Appeal No.133/14 & con.cases. -2- claimed. 2. The appeals filed before the Commissioner of Income- tax were

THE COMMI.OF INCOME TAX,HYD. vs. VAIBHAV

ITTA/134/2003HC Telangana14 Sept 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant: SRI A.V.KRISHNA KOUNDINYA, SENIOR COUNSELFor Respondent: SRI J.V'PRASAD, SC FOR l'T DEPARTMENT
Section 1aSection 250Section 260Section 68

undisclosed investment in stock It was noticed that there was substantial difference between the two disclosures and that the stock position declared to the bank was only to satisfy the debit ratio, current ratio, capital base required bythe bank 7. As a matter of fact, CIT($ put the assessee on notice