BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 149clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai497Delhi445Bangalore268Chennai128Kolkata82Chandigarh79Jaipur66Amritsar55Raipur49Ahmedabad47Hyderabad39Pune26Karnataka23Cuttack21Lucknow20Visakhapatnam19Surat18Rajkot15Indore13Jodhpur11Nagpur10Guwahati7Kerala5SC5Ranchi4Agra4Telangana3Cochin2Varanasi2Dehradun2Panaji1Rajasthan1Calcutta1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 252Section 12A2

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indur Green Power Private Limited

In the result, all the appeals fail and are hereby

ITTA/627/2015HC Telangana02 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 260Section 80G(5)

149 Expenditure Operating Expenses 2,97,86,327 2,92,31,480 3,10,33,514 1,62,44,044 Administrative & General Expenses 75,90,435 72,16,710 59,16,501 75,94,422 Interest & Financial Charges 1,80,438 7198 5,95,460 10,16,946 Depreciation

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

depreciation. The rate of minimum tax was kept at a modest figure deeming 30 per cent of book profits as total income. This modest amount is likely to go down further with the downward revision of corporate tax rate to 35 per cent and abolition of surcharge. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 45.4 The Act also inserts a new section 115JAA

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Sri. B. Yadagiri,

ITTA/13/2000HC Telangana01 Dec 2011

Bench: The Appellate Commissioner. On All The Three Aspects, Referred To Above, The Appellate Authority Held In Favour Of The Respondent. In The Further Appeal Filed By The Department Before The Tribunal, The View Taken By The Appellate Authority Was Confirmed.

For Appellant: Sri J.V.PrasadFor Respondent: Sri A.V.Raghuveer
Section 256(1)

149 ITR 52 3. 233 ITR 468 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.13 of 2000 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The respondent herein is an assessee. The assessments for the years 1975-76 and 1985-86 to 1987-88 came to be dealt with