BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 132(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai889Delhi793Bangalore332Chennai155Kolkata104Jaipur101Ahmedabad101Hyderabad96Chandigarh90Amritsar49Pune45Raipur40Visakhapatnam31Karnataka26Cochin24Nagpur22Lucknow21Indore21Guwahati19SC14Rajkot13Surat13Cuttack13Kerala7Dehradun4Ranchi4Allahabad3Calcutta3Agra2Telangana2Rajasthan1Panaji1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Jodhpur1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1Patna1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1475Section 153A2Section 1482

The Comissioner of Income Tax III, vs. Smt. Shanti Singh,

ITTA/51/2007HC Telangana15 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 132(1)Section 143Section 144Section 147Section 158

132(1) of 6 e n d r f VARINDER SINGH 2024.11.14 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment ITA N the Income T filed by the a to a three Jud the appeal on officer were Assessee are 3. Mittal is con appellant the material unc Chapter-XIV of search cas tax under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV vs. M/S QUALITY CARE INDIA LTD

ITTA/261/2015HC Telangana13 Jul 2016

A.SHANKAR NARAYANA,V RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Bench:
For Appellant: Mr. J.V. PrasadFor Respondent: The Senior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 260A

132, as a consequence of which, proceedings were initiated under Section 153A. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) r/w Section 153A. After completion of the assessment, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under Section 147 by issuing a notice under Section 148, on 31.03.2011. 5. The reason for reopening of the assessment was that while initiating proceedings under