BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai141Delhi137Kolkata46Ahmedabad14Bangalore12Jaipur9Surat8SC7Chennai6Pune4Nagpur4Guwahati4Rajkot4Telangana3Karnataka2Indore1Hyderabad1Gauhati1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Cuttack1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 115J4Section 1154Section 12Section 260A2

AP. STATE SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HYD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, HYD.

ITTA/232/2006HC Telangana21 Dec 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant: SRl. C. P. RAMASWAMIFor Respondent: Ms. K. MAMATACHOUDARY SENIOR SC FOR
Section 1Section 115JSection 260A

depreciation which woul l be required to be set off against the profit I / 8 of the relevant previous year as if the provisions of clause (b) of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 205 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), are applicable. (2) Nothing contained in sub-section (l) sha.ll a-ffect the determination

Commissioner of Income tax vs. Sri. B. Ramesh,

ITTA/23/2000HC Telangana
03 Feb 2012
Section 1Section 115Section 115J

depreciation as provided under the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (in short “the Rules”) in the process of drawing up profit and loss account as required to be done under sub-section 1(a) of 115J

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there