Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 91clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 214

The Commissioner of Income TAx-IV, vs. M/s. Mahaveer Enterprises (India) Limited

The Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/94/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 21

condonation of delay and that exercise of discretion in favour of the Appellants is untenable. The Tribunal also discussed merits of the case and dismissed the appeal on merits following Full Bench decision of Gujarat High Court. 24. The observations made by the learned Single Judge in the said judgement (Coram: A.P. Ravani, J.) about Section 10(3) declaration vesting

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari

Accordingly are partly allowed

ITTA/23/2008HC Telangana28 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

delay. 38. He submits that learned Single Judge although purportedly referred to cases cited above, considered those oblivious of underlying principle. The matters require re-appreciation and reconsideration. 16. He further submits, may be that an objection to maintainability of the appeals is sought to be raised, however, the same having been raised after admission of the appeals, it loses

The Commissioner of Income TAx-IV, vs. M/s. Mahaveer Enterprises (India) Limited

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari

The Commissioner of Income TAx-IV, vs. M/s. Mahaveer Enterprises (India) Limited

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV, vs. Parnika Constructions P. Ltd.,

M/s Nuland Infrastructure(P) Ltd vs. Principle Commissioner of Income Tax - 4

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.