BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai631Mumbai539Delhi388Kolkata340Bangalore219Hyderabad213Ahmedabad182Karnataka128Jaipur126Pune85Surat82Raipur77Chandigarh69Visakhapatnam59Nagpur59Indore56Amritsar53Lucknow49Cochin45Calcutta41Rajkot32Patna23SC19Cuttack18Kerala17Allahabad14Jodhpur12Varanasi11Agra9Jabalpur8Guwahati7Telangana5Panaji4Dehradun4Ranchi3Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan2Orissa1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1

Key Topics

Section 1243Section 1512Section 12A2

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K.V. Srinivasa Rao

Accordingly, the instant appeal being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed

ITTA/516/2017HC Telangana21 Aug 2017
For Appellant: Mr. G.C. Jha, Advocate
Section 140Section 151Section 5

Section 151 CPC for stay of Execution/Revocation Case No.34 of 2017 pending in the court of District Judge-III at Jamshedpur. 8. Learned counsel for the appellant has thus submitted that delay may be condoned and stay of Execution Case may be granted after hearing the parties, be pleased to set aside the award. 9. Heard, learned counsel

Maheswara Educational Society, vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)

ITTA/90/2008HC Telangana09 Apr 2025

P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Bench:
For Appellant: SRI C V NARASIMHAM, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI A RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR INCOME
Section 10Section 124Section 12ASection 260Section 260ASection 72A

90 OF 2008 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against the Order dated 31-10-2007 passed in ITA No.270iHydl2005 for the Assessment Year 2004-2OO5 on the file of the lnmme Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad. Between: Maheswara Educational Warangal District. Society,, Maheswaram, Narasampet Mandal, ...Appellant AND Director

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari

Accordingly are partly allowed

ITTA/23/2008HC Telangana28 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

90 of 2013 “Ramesh S/o Vithal Mane and others Vs. Gurling S/o Mahadeo Bhavare and others”, wherein it has been observed thus, “16. The above said circumstances show that, before the learned Single Judge of this Court, the decision of MRT was challenged and the decision was given within scope of provisions of Section 91 of the Hyderabad Tenancy

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

ITTA/108/2022HC Telangana25 Sept 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 18 and explained its significance in the following words: ―22. The significance of Section 18 of the Act can be understood in the light of the above provisions. Section 18 provides for provisional assessment of duty in cases specified in sub-section (1) of the section. Clause (c) of sub-section (1) deals with cases where the importer

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

ITTA/94/2022HC Telangana24 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 18 and explained its significance in the following words: ―22. The significance of Section 18 of the Act can be understood in the light of the above provisions. Section 18 provides for provisional assessment of duty in cases specified in sub-section (1) of the section. Clause (c) of sub-section (1) deals with cases where the importer