Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 210clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV, vs. Parnika Constructions P. Ltd.,

Appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms

ITTA/73/2014HC Telangana01 Jul 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

delay of 66 days in preferring the appeal is condoned as no counter affidavit has been filed by the Insurance Company and the reason assigned by the appellants is acceptable to the court. Accordingly I.A. No. 602 of 2021 is allowed. M.A. No. 73 of 2014 1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. -2- 2. The instant Miscellaneous Appeal

EVEREST ORGANICS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T., HYDERABAD

ITTA/9/2005HC Telangana21 Sept 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 143(1)(a)

210=00 1992-93 5,94,40,840=00 g) Being aggrieved by the assessment order the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) on various grounds including the validity of reassessment proceedings. The CIT(A) after hearing the parties vide its order upheld the order passed by the AO under Section 143(3) read with Section

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV, vs. Parnika Constructions P. Ltd.,

EVEREST ORGANICS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T., HYDERABAD

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV, vs. Parnika Constructions P. Ltd.,

EVEREST ORGANICS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T., HYDERABAD

C. SANYASI RAJU vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIZAG.

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. M/s.Samrakshna Electricals Ltd

M/s.GVK Petro Chemicals Private Limited,(Novo Resins AND vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,