BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai204Delhi115Karnataka101Mumbai79Chandigarh61Pune50Kolkata39Amritsar35Jaipur30Bangalore30Surat19Ahmedabad19Lucknow18Indore17Rajkot9Hyderabad7Agra5Patna5Telangana5Visakhapatnam5Cuttack4SC3Calcutta3Ranchi2Jabalpur2Raipur2Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Rajasthan1Cochin1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1513Section 1732Section 1632

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K.V. Srinivasa Rao

Accordingly, the instant appeal being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed

ITTA/516/2017HC Telangana21 Aug 2017
For Appellant: Mr. G.C. Jha, Advocate
Section 140Section 151Section 5

condonation of delay and I.A. No.5708 of 2020 filed for stay of the execution case, both are hereby closed. 19. It is expected that since the occurrence is of dated 24.06.2009, the appellant- Oriental Insurance Company Limited must indemnify the impugned award within a period of 90 days from today. 20. Learned Registrar General of this Court is directed

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, vs. Sri. P.Krishna

ITTA/301/2010HC Telangana22 Mar 2016

RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Bench:
Section 15Section 151Section 173

condone the delay in filinq the cross-objections on condition that the claimant is entitled for rnlerest on the enhanced compensation from the date of filing of the cross-objecttons. 13. ln the light of the above discussion, the cross-objecto/claimant is entitled for compensation under the following heads; 1. Loss of dependency 2. Consortium 3. Funeral expenses

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari

Accordingly are partly allowed

ITTA/23/2008HC Telangana28 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

173 of 1952 for partition of properties, inter-alia, aforesaid land had been instituted and aforesaid land had been given to share of appellants and had been standing in the name of appellant no. 1. They had all along been in possession. During proceedings under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (hereinafter “Ceiling Act”) it had been considered

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. M/s. V.Dhana Reddy AND Co.,

ITTA/137/2017HC Telangana14 Nov 2017

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

For Appellant: - National Insurance Co. Ltd. Lucknow Thru. AssttFor Respondent: - Gaurav Sharma And Anr
Section 163Section 166Section 173

173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1908 (here-in-after referred as MV Act) challenging the judgment and award dated 23.11.2016 passed in Claim Petition No.163 of 2011 (Gaurav Sharma Vs. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari and another). The F.A.F.O. No.217 of 2017 has been filed for 2 enhancement of compensation. Hence both the appeals are clubbed and decided together with this common

Vidyananda Educational Society vs. The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)II

ITTA/152/2013HC Telangana09 Jul 2013

Bench: The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Dated : 12.08.2022 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice P.Velmurugan A.S. (Md) No.152 Of 2013 & Cross. Obj(Md)No.23 Of 2022 A.S(Md)No.152 Of 2013 The Special Tahsildar (La) Adi-Dravidar Welfare Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Appellant/Referring Officer Vs. Thiru.Manikandan (Died) 2.Mrs.Sornam 3.Mrs.Kaleeswari 4.Sivakumar 5.M.Kohiladevi ... Respondents/ Claimants Nos.2 To 5 Prayer: Appeal Suit Filed Under Section 54 Of The Land Acquisition Act, To Set Aside The Judgment & Decree, Dated 20.12.2006 Made In L.A.O.P.No. 11 Of 1996, On The File Of The Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal/Additional District Court-Cum-Fast Track No.4, Periyakulam. _________ Page 1 Of 15 Https://Www.Mhc.Tn.Gov.In/Judis

For Appellant: Mr.T.VilavankothaiFor Respondent: Mr.T.Vilavankothai
Section 4(1)Section 54

section 4(1), dated 29.09.1994 and based on the permission granted by the Government, dated 20.12.1994, the District Collector has fixed an award at Rs.99,173/- for 3 acre 13 cents. Since the land owner did not agree to the amount determined by the District Collector, Madurai, the Special Tahsildar (LAADW), Periyakulam referred the matter to the land acquisition Tribunal