The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari
Accordingly are partly allowed
ITTA/23/2008HC Telangana28 Mar 2016
Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
delay.
38.
He submits that learned Single Judge although
purportedly referred to cases cited above, considered those
oblivious of underlying principle. The matters require
re-appreciation and reconsideration.
16.
He further submits, may be that an objection to
maintainability of the appeals is sought to be raised, however, the
same having been raised after admission of the appeals, it loses