M/S MAQSOD AND CO HYDERABAD vs. THE COMMNER OF INCOME TAX HYD

permanent handicap? 4. Whether at the time of the accident, Car No. DDQ-8855 was insured with opposite party No.2? 5. How much is the claimant entitled to in compensation and from which opposite party?” 10. In support of his case, the claimant examined himself as PW-1, Himanshu Awasthi as PW-2, Vineet Agarwal

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

establish guilt and secure conviction of the accused by proving the charge ―beyond reasonable doubt‖. In Ramakant Rai v. Madan Rai [Ramakant Rai v. Madan Rai, (2003) 12 SCC 395 : 2004 SCC (Cri) Supp 445] referring to the expression ―reasonable doubt‖ in criminal law it was held as under : (SCC p. 405, para 24) ―24. Doubts would be called reasonable

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

establish guilt and secure conviction of the accused by proving the charge ―beyond reasonable doubt‖. In Ramakant Rai v. Madan Rai [Ramakant Rai v. Madan Rai, (2003) 12 SCC 395 : 2004 SCC (Cri) Supp 445] referring to the expression ―reasonable doubt‖ in criminal law it was held as under : (SCC p. 405, para 24) ―24. Doubts would be called reasonable