BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,501Delhi965Chennai426Jaipur395Kolkata367Ahmedabad285Hyderabad249Bangalore222Pune145Indore143Cochin123Chandigarh116Nagpur94Surat86Amritsar55Rajkot55Visakhapatnam52Raipur50Guwahati48Calcutta39Lucknow34Cuttack34Panaji29Agra24Patna16Allahabad14Jodhpur14Karnataka12Ranchi9Jabalpur9SC4Dehradun4Telangana3Rajasthan3Orissa2Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 2602Section 3022Section 3642Section 2012

The Commissioner of Income Tax III, vs. M/s. Swagath Seeds Private Limited

ITTA/346/2010HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 2(14)Section 260Section 64(1)(IV)

unexplained investment in Harey estate of Rs.9,45,000/-(Point 15) Assessee’s submissions may be accepted.” 9. Thus, from perusal of the report submitted by the Assessing Officer himself, it is evident that, if the Remand Report is accepted with regard to long term capital gains

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

capital of the company. This fact was brought to the notice of the assessee vide order sheet entry dated 29.12.2009. No satisfactory reply has been filed. It is therefore, disallowed from the revenue expenses claimed by the assessee. Penalty proceedings u/s271(1)(c) r.w 274 of the Income-tax Act for concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars are initiated separately

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

ITTA/147/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
For Appellant: - Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assistedFor Respondent: - A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan
Section 156(3)Section 201Section 302Section 363Section 364Section 366Section 376

Capital Case No.2667 of 2017. (ix) Vide order dated 8.2.2007, the accused was remanded to police custody till 22.2.2007 in case pertaining to victim 'D'. (x) Again on 22.2.2007 an application for police remand was moved by CBI IO MS Phartyal stating as under:- “That custodial interrogation of accused Surender Koli is necessary in the proper and just investigation