M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

viii) The probate proceedings shall be conducted by the Probate Court in the manner prescribed in the Act and in no other way. Therefore, it cannot be argued that there is any lacuna in the Act to cover any exigency concerning a probate proceedings or Administrator Proceedings. (ix) That, the Court is well-equipped under Section 247 of the Succession

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

viii. Ashish Malhotra - He did his Electrical Engineering and PG Diploma in Marketing. His designation is 'Sales Manager'. He is an employee of GEIIPL working since 2001. ix. Jaimin Shah - He did his Mechanical Engineering. His designation is 'Account Executive'. He is an employee of GEIIPL working since 2002. Annexure 21 discussing his roles and responsibilities provides through the first

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

Section 27 begins with a proviso and states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered, in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered may be proved, 49 whether it amounts to a confession

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. M/s Hyderabad House Pvt Ltd.,

56. The court faces the challenge of determining “just compensation”, in each such case. The issue needs to be addressed, inter alia, in the context of considerations in the nature of future prospects and inflationary trends affecting the loss of real value of money. In Sarla Verma (supra), a bench of two Hon‟ble Judges of the Supreme Court standardized