BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 32(1)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai161Delhi99Ahmedabad64Chennai57Chandigarh50Kolkata35Raipur34Cochin33Bangalore25Nagpur16Pune15Hyderabad14Indore10Jaipur10Cuttack9Guwahati8Agra4Lucknow4Visakhapatnam4Telangana3SC2Karnataka2Jodhpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 966

THEE COMMSSR.OF INCOME TAX.HYD. vs. CHALLA SHANKER REDDY.HYD.

ITTA/80/2002HC Telangana13 Dec 2013

Bench: L.NARASIMHA REDDY,T.SUNIL CHOWDARY

Section 96

iIA Appeals. 4. For the s:rll: of convenience, we propose to Ceal witt the batch of Appeals in trr.. ;r:ts i.e., the ,.GpA Appeals" (2OO.2) and Lhe ,.partition Appeal" (2O)3 . 2 CCCA.Nos.77 . 80, 81 and 82 of 2002 - "GPA Appeals" 5. These Appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23 'O2 '2OOl dismissing

COMMR.OF I.T. RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S.NARAYANA CHOWDARYAND ORS KAKINADA

ITTA/82/2002HC Telangana10 Dec 2013

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 96

iIA Appeals. 4. For the s:rll: of convenience, we propose to Ceal witt the batch of Appeals in trr.. ;r:ts i.e., the ,.GpA Appeals" (2OO.2) and Lhe ,.partition Appeal" (2O)3 . 2 CCCA.Nos.77 . 80, 81 and 82 of 2002 - "GPA Appeals" 5. These Appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23 'O2 '2OOl dismissing

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - (TDS), vs. M/s. Suman Chit Funds (P) Ltd.,

ITTA/120/2013HC Telangana27 Jun 2013
Section 96

iIA Appeals. 4. For the s:rll: of convenience, we propose to Ceal witt the batch of Appeals in trr.. ;r:ts i.e., the ,.GpA Appeals" (2OO.2) and Lhe ,.partition Appeal" (2O)3 . 2 CCCA.Nos.77 . 80, 81 and 82 of 2002 - "GPA Appeals" 5. These Appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23 'O2 '2OOl dismissing