Search: TDS | BharatTax

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 194J3 Section 2602 Section 2012 Section 201(1)2 Section 682 TDS2

PENDURTHI CHANDRASEKHAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

The appeal is allowed and all the four substantial

ITTA/706/2016HC Telangana26 Apr 2018

For Appellant: Mr. K. Vasantha KumarFor Respondent: Mrs. M. Kiranmayee

Section 132Section 145Section 153Section 260Section 56Section 68

2) of Section 56, we have held against the assessee in ITTA.No. 703 of 2016 by a judgment rendered today, VRS, J & JUD, J I.T.T.A.No.706 of 2016 7 distinguishing the decision dated 23-02-2018 passed in ITTA. Nos.701 and 702 of 2016. But in this case, the decision in ITTA.Nos.701 and 702 of 2016 squarely applies

PENDURTHI CHANDRASEKHAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

PENDURTHI CHANDRASEKHAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. M/s. Celestial Laboratories Limited,