BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 205clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai302Delhi251Bangalore158Karnataka105Hyderabad62Chennai58Kolkata52Raipur37Ahmedabad37Jaipur26Pune19Chandigarh14Surat13Guwahati11Indore9Lucknow8Patna8Telangana5Cochin4Varanasi4SC4Agra2Amritsar2Nagpur2Rajkot2Punjab & Haryana1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1Calcutta1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 2602Deduction2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/55/2010HC Telangana20 Dec 2024

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Section 260

Sections 36 (1) (iii) of the Act are met, deduction of interest cannot be denied merely because the Assessee was a cash rich company having enough resources of its own. 68. It is pointed out that in the earlier years Gopal Das Bhawan was still under construction and the interest was capitalised only up to the stage of completion

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Kokivenkateswara Reddy AND others,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/210/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260

Sections 36 (1) (iii) of the Act are met, deduction of interest cannot be denied merely because the Assessee was a cash rich company having enough resources of its own. 68. It is pointed out that in the earlier years Gopal Das Bhawan was still under construction and the interest was capitalised only up to the stage of completion

Late Smt. Hoorjahan Begum vs. Tghe Income Tax Officer

Appeal stands disposed off

ITTA/448/2015HC Telangana07 Dec 2015

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,S.RAVI KUMAR

Section 192(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has deducted the tax at source from the employee's salary. In case if an objection is raised by any party, the objector is required to prove by producing evidence such as LPC to suggest that the employer failed to deduct the TDS from the salary of the employee. However, there

M/S. SREE TRADING CORPORATION vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1), HYDERABAD

ITTA/205/2006HC Telangana01 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant: Ms. I.Maamu VaniFor Respondent: Mr. J.V.Prasad
Section 143(3)Section 260A

Section 131(1)(b) of the Act on 16.02.2004. In the said statement, he denied that appellant was required to pay M/s. Trans India Express a sum of Rs.7,83,970.00. He also denied issuing any confirmation letter as produced by the appellant. According to the assessing officer, when this aspect was brought to the notice HCJ & NTRJ I.T.T.A.No.205

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

TDS. These expenses are hereby disallowed u/s40a(ia). Surveying & consultation exp B L G Construction 89809 Office renovation Ghanshyam Jangid 180335 Advertisement Kalarthi 134549 Site office Kaluram Sonel 55230 Advertisement Kushal Global Ltd 24750 Supervision over contractors @ 2% Sudesh Purohit 69317 Advertisement Vikalp Events & Promotion 77000 Advertisement Vyas Enterprises 22448 CD Presentation Sandeep Yadav 75000 Total 728438 Subject