BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 02clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,253Delhi1,072Bangalore569Chennai351Kolkata338Ahmedabad176Hyderabad174Pune163Jaipur126Chandigarh104Raipur98Karnataka89Indore70Surat45Lucknow40Cuttack31Nagpur29Visakhapatnam26Guwahati23Rajkot22Ranchi22Agra21Allahabad21Patna18Jodhpur18Amritsar13Cochin13Jabalpur11Dehradun8Telangana7Varanasi7SC6Panaji6Calcutta5Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Deduction3TDS3Addition to Income3Section 682

Late Smt. Hoorjahan Begum vs. Tghe Income Tax Officer

Appeal stands disposed off

ITTA/448/2015HC Telangana07 Dec 2015

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,S.RAVI KUMAR

Section 192(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has deducted the tax at source from the employee's salary. In case if an objection is raised by any party, the objector is required to prove by producing evidence such as LPC to suggest that the employer failed to deduct the TDS from the salary of the employee. However, there

PENDURTHI CHANDRASEKHAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

The appeal is allowed and all the four substantial

ITTA/706/2016HC Telangana26 Apr 2018
For Appellant: Mr. K. Vasantha KumarFor Respondent: Mrs. M. Kiranmayee
Section 132
Section 145
Section 153
Section 260
Section 56
Section 68

TDS on entire amount in utter disregard to the provisions of Sec.145 of the Act and method of accounting followed by the assessee? 3. Heard Mr. K. Vasantha Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Smt. M. Kiranmayee, learned senior standing counsel for the Department. 4. A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s. Cargo Handling Pvt. Workers Pool

ITTA/17/2011HC Telangana29 Feb 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 120

02 of 2005 came to hold in the case of the respondent-Rajesh Koul that there is no evidence to show that he was aware about the fakeness of TDS certificate and, therefore, no criminal culpability can be fastened upon him in processing the refund claim which was sanctioned not by the respondent-Rajesh Koul but by another official

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Polisetty Somasundaram,

ITTA/140/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
Section 144Section 80

TDS was deducted and deposited in the Government account. Since no information was furnished by the assessee nor any evidence is available on record to substantiate the claim of the assessee as genuine, the expenses of Rs.2,00,00,000/- not relating to the business were disallowed and added to the income of the assessee.” Against the said order

Commissioner of Income Tax-V, IT Towers vs. Smt.C.Nagarani

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/145/2012HC Telangana06 Aug 2013
Section 201

TDS) Bhubaneswar …. Appellant Mr.S.S. Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel -versus- Western Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Limited (WESCO), Burla …. Respondent CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 10.02.2022 02. 1. The present appeal is directed against an order dated 14th August, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) in ITA No.433/CTK/2011 for the Assessment

The Commissioner of Income Tax- I vs. M/s. Avon Organics Limited

ITTA/257/2012HC Telangana17 Jul 2012

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 10B

section 5(1)(xxi) as exemption was claimed as a new and separate unit set up after the commencement of the Act. The Madras High ITA 257/2012 Page 9 of 18 Court at page 824 observes : “Unless a factory is erected and the plant and machinery installed therein, it cannot be said to have been set up. The resolutions

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/s. Kura Homes Pvt. Ltd.,

Appeal stands allowed

ITTA/504/2015HC Telangana06 Jan 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: Ms. Swati Shalini, Advocate
Section 166

Section 166 of the M.V. Act. Learned Tribunal, on perusal of the documents brought on record and after hearing counsel for the parties and upon going through the written statement as well as other documents, framed following issues for proper and just adjudication of the case:- i) Whether this claim case is maintainable in the present form