Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Smt G Sailaja

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDINGS, L.B.SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 3 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER IDUKKI, THODUPUZHA - 685 584. 4 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER KOTTAYAM - 686 006. 5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VAYASKARA KUNNU, PALACE ROAD, W.A. No.410/15 & Conn. Cases 69 KOTTAYAM 686 001. BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS

Commissioner of Income TAx-II, Hyderabad vs. M/s. Sri Balaji Bio MAss Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDINGS, L.B.SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 3 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER IDUKKI, THODUPUZHA - 685 584. 4 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER KOTTAYAM - 686 006. 5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VAYASKARA KUNNU, PALACE ROAD, W.A. No.410/15 & Conn. Cases 69 KOTTAYAM 686 001. BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS

The Commissioner of Income Tax -1 vs. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDINGS, L.B.SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 3 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER IDUKKI, THODUPUZHA - 685 584. 4 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER KOTTAYAM - 686 006. 5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VAYASKARA KUNNU, PALACE ROAD, W.A. No.410/15 & Conn. Cases 69 KOTTAYAM 686 001. BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. The Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd.,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDINGS, L.B.SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 3 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER IDUKKI, THODUPUZHA - 685 584. 4 THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER KOTTAYAM - 686 006. 5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VAYASKARA KUNNU, PALACE ROAD, W.A. No.410/15 & Conn. Cases 69 KOTTAYAM 686 001. BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Southern Packaging

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

block assessment order is not justified just because a notice under section 142(1) was issued prior to the search and the proceeding so initiated remained to be concluded, when the assessee has neither filed a return of income in response to notice under section 4 142(1) so issued nor has paid any taxes by way of advance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

block of Rs.4,92,10,011/-. The Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that the asseessee is not entitled to claim deduction of any amount twice, while arriving at the income of the concern. Accordingly, the depreciation claimed by the assessee in respect of the buildings amounting to Rs.4,92,10,011/- which was already allowed in the earlier assessment

M/S.VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED vs. THE ASST COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The Appeal is allowed

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Assessment Order dated: 09-03-2015 passed in TAN/PAN No. HYD|00916G/AAACB2100P on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax(TDS), TDS Circle 1(1 ), Hyderabad. Between: M/s.Vodafone ldea Limited, (Formerly Known as M/s.ldea Cellular Limited), 5-9- 62,Khan Lateef Khan Estate,Fateh Maidan Road,Basheerbagh,Hyderabad- 500004,Telangana ...APPELLANT AND The Asst Commissioner Of lncome

COMMR OF INCOME TAX-II, HYDERABAD vs. M/S JAPSON ESTATES PVT LTD., HYDERABAD

The appeal is allowed;

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560095 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANMATHI E.I ., ADVOCATE) THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT, TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT