M/S QUEEN'S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX
C.A. No.-005167-005167 - 2008Supreme Court16 Mar 2015
Bench: The Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital, May Be Gleaned From The Facts Of One Of Them, Namely, The Queen’S Educational Society Case. The Appellant Filed Its Return For Assessment Years 2000-2001 & 2001-2002 Showing A Net Surplus Of Rs.6,58,862/- & Rs.7,82,632/- Respectively. Since The Appellant Was Established With The Sole 2
Section 10Section 10(22)Section 260A
224 ITR 310 (SC)],
that in the case of an educational institution, after
meeting the expenditure, if any surplus results
incidentally, then the institution will not cease to be
one existing solely for educational purposes.
6. The crucial condition is that surplus should result
only incidentally and should not be aimed for. If
substantial profits are earned in one year