BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 35(2)(ab)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi294Mumbai133Bangalore72Jaipur68Cochin62Hyderabad46Chandigarh30Chennai21Raipur18Ahmedabad17Indore16Kolkata12Pune10Dehradun8Surat3Lucknow3Jodhpur2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 69B3Section 292C2Section 1482Survey u/s 133A2Addition to Income2

ITO, WARD-2(2)(3), SURAT vs. MAHESHCHAND G. PATEL (HUF), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 20/SRT/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) I.T.O., Maheshchandra G. Patel (Huf), Ward-2(2)(3), 22, Vrajbhumi, Tirumala Society, In Vs. Surat. Front Of Balaji Nagar, Piplod, Surat. Pan No. Aajhm 2315 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 292C

35,188/- was arrived and 1/4th of which was mentioned as Rs. 3,89,58,796/- etc, etc. The Assessing Officer noted 5 ITO Vs Maheshchandra G. Patel (HUF) that the registered sale deed reflect the rate at Rs. 399/- per square yard and total sale consideration as per sale deed was Rs. 39,60,000/-. Thus, on the basis

AVI GLOBAL PLAST PVT. LTD.,,DAMAN & DIU (UT) vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 300/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.300/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Virtual Court Hearing) Avi Global Plast Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Acit, Vapi Circle, Survey No.266/4, 266/5, 266/6, 268/1, Vapi. 269/4, Village – Dunitha Bhenslore Nani Daman – 396210, Damand & Diu (Ut), India. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabcc5843R

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), dated 24.12.2019. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows: “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act which

RAJESH PODDAR,SURAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT

In the result, assessee's appeal is dismissed

ITA 547/SRT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2025AY 2020-21
Section 143(3)Section 69BSection 69C

transfer the subject land. The AO also noted that the said\nland has been purchased by the assessee and Shri Kedar Jagirdar from Smt.\nParulben Patel and others, therefore, facts written in this letter of undertaking\nare true and relevant to the transaction of purchase of land. Before the AO, the\nassessee contended that this document is a mere draft