Search: transfer pricing

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi232 Mumbai143 Hyderabad107 Chennai71 Jaipur64 Cochin63 Bangalore56 Chandigarh33 Ahmedabad27 Indore25 Guwahati18 Nagpur17 Rajkot14 Lucknow6 Pune4 Jodhpur3 Surat2 Amritsar1 Varanasi1 Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 69B3 Section 143(3)2 Section 292C2 Section 1482 Addition to Income2

ITO, WARD-2(2)(3), SURAT vs. MAHESHCHAND G. PATEL (HUF), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 20/SRT/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) I.T.O., Maheshchandra G. Patel (Huf), Ward-2(2)(3), 22, Vrajbhumi, Tirumala Society, In Vs. Surat. Front Of Balaji Nagar, Piplod, Surat. Pan No. Aajhm 2315 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 292C

price. There is presumption under Section 292C about the documents seized during the search from the control and ownership of co-owner that said document belonged to assessee and his co-owner. During the search action, Pitamberbhai Ruchandani stated that writing on the seized material may be in the handwriting of his brother Arjundan Ruchandani, who was no more. During

ITO, WARD-2(2)(3), SURAT vs. MAHESHCHAND G. PATEL (HUF), SURAT

ITO, WARD-2(2)(3), SURAT vs. MAHESHCHAND G. PATEL (HUF), SURAT

RAJESH PODDAR,SURAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT