BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 5A(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka298Delhi103Mumbai87Pune69Hyderabad33Kolkata30Chennai28Bangalore27Jaipur22Raipur17Ahmedabad16Surat9Indore8SC8Ranchi7Telangana6Panaji3Lucknow3Chandigarh3Amritsar2Cuttack2Nagpur1Patna1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 254(1)9Section 143(3)9Section 37(1)9Section 99Deduction9Disallowance9Comparables/TP3

DCIT., CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT vs. SHREE MADHI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDLI LTD.,, DIST. SURAT

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 68/SRT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

4. We have heard the submission of Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee and Ld. CIT-Departmental Representative (DR) for the Revenue. The Ld. AR for the assessee submits that the grounds of appeal raised by assessee is covered by the decision of co-ordinate Bench of 6 ITA Nos. 72, 68 & 73/SRT/2020 (A.Ys. 12-13 & 13-14) Shree

SHREE MADHI VIBHAG SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD,BARDOLI vs. ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 72/SRT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

4. We have heard the submission of Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee and Ld. CIT-Departmental Representative (DR) for the Revenue. The Ld. AR for the assessee submits that the grounds of appeal raised by assessee is covered by the decision of co-ordinate Bench of 6 ITA Nos. 72, 68 & 73/SRT/2020 (A.Ys. 12-13 & 13-14) Shree

SHREE MADHI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDLI LTD.,,DIST. SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 73/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

4. We have heard the submission of Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee and Ld. CIT-Departmental Representative (DR) for the Revenue. The Ld. AR for the assessee submits that the grounds of appeal raised by assessee is covered by the decision of co-ordinate Bench of 6 ITA Nos. 72, 68 & 73/SRT/2020 (A.Ys. 12-13 & 13-14) Shree

SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 83/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department taxing unreal and wrong amount of income. 7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, the C.I.T.(Appeals) failed to As per Sr. No. 1 above. appreciate that on identical facts, in the past in all the assessment years, such price was allowed

ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI vs. SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDHYOG MANDLI LTD, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 104/SRT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department taxing unreal and wrong amount of income. 7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, the C.I.T.(Appeals) failed to As per Sr. No. 1 above. appreciate that on identical facts, in the past in all the assessment years, such price was allowed

SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 82/SRT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department taxing unreal and wrong amount of income. 7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, the C.I.T.(Appeals) failed to As per Sr. No. 1 above. appreciate that on identical facts, in the past in all the assessment years, such price was allowed

ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI vs. SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDHYOG MANDLI LTD, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 105/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department taxing unreal and wrong amount of income. 7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, the C.I.T.(Appeals) failed to As per Sr. No. 1 above. appreciate that on identical facts, in the past in all the assessment years, such price was allowed

ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI vs. SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDHYOG MANDLI LTD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 106/SRT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department taxing unreal and wrong amount of income. 7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, the C.I.T.(Appeals) failed to As per Sr. No. 1 above. appreciate that on identical facts, in the past in all the assessment years, such price was allowed

SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 84/SRT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 37(1)Section 9

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department taxing unreal and wrong amount of income. 7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, the C.I.T.(Appeals) failed to As per Sr. No. 1 above. appreciate that on identical facts, in the past in all the assessment years, such price was allowed