Search: section 68

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai54 Delhi27 Kolkata9 Bangalore7 Raipur6 Surat5 Jaipur3 Pune3 Chennai2 Hyderabad2 Rajkot2 Ahmedabad2 SC1 Chandigarh1 Indore1

Key Topics

Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)3 Section 1473 Search & Seizure3 Section 54B2 Section 55A2

MUKESHBHAI RAMUBHAI AHIR,,SURAT vs. ITO,WARD-1(3) (3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1652/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Jun 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Mukeshbhai Ramubhai Ahir Ito, Ward-1(3)(3), 49,-B, Ambanagar, Room No. 603, 6Th Floor, Vs B/H Kapadia Health Club, Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Bhatar, Surat-395002. Gate, Surat. Pan : Aqqpa1546H Applicant Respondent

Section 147Section 254(1)Section 54B

68,83,333/-. The assessee claimed indexation cost at Rs. 62,30,412/ by adopting fair market value at Rs. 350/ per sq Mtr as on 01.04.1981. The assessee filed its reply dated 23.03.2016 and stated that no Jantri rate concept was applicable in 1981. The sale-deeds were executed as per consideration shown on record by purchaser and seller

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for in ITA

MUKESHBHAI RAMUBHAI AHIR,,SURAT vs. ITO,WARD-1(3) (3),, SURAT

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

MUKESHBHAI RAMUBHAI AHIR,,SURAT vs. ITO,WARD-1(3) (3),, SURAT

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT, SURAT vs. JAYANTIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BABARIYA, SURAT

SHRI JAYANTIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BABARIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.-2, SURAT vs. SHRI JAYANTIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BABARIYA, SURAT