BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

21 results for “section 68”+ Section 55(2)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka385Mumbai196Delhi161Hyderabad126Chennai59Calcutta50Bangalore48Kolkata42Jaipur28Chandigarh26Ahmedabad23Surat21Indore15SC13Telangana13Rajkot8Patna8Cochin5Rajasthan4Varanasi4Agra3Nagpur3Lucknow2Raipur2Amritsar2Pune2Andhra Pradesh1Visakhapatnam1Orissa1Cuttack1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Addition to Income21Section 143(3)19Survey u/s 133A10Business Income9Cash Deposit7Demonetization7Section 80I6Section 271(1)(c)5Section 684Section 133A

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 306/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 305/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

3
Disallowance3
Search & Seizure3
ITAT Surat
27 Apr 2023
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRA CIR.2, SURAT vs. DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA PVT. LTD., SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 51/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 303/SRT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. M/S. DAGINA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., , SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 312/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 304/SRT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 30/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

AC Market, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007. PAN: AABCD9702C Date of Hearing: 12/04/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 27/04/2023 Appellant by: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CA Respondent by: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR ITA Nos. 30 & 51/SRT/2022 & 303-306 & 312/SRT/2022 M/s. Dagina Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. आदेश

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC, VAPI vs. M/S. M POONAM DEVELOPERS, VALSAD

In the result, these Cross-Objections Nos

ITA 284/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

68 of the Act, which is to be taxed under the provisions u/s 115BBE of the Act, despite the fact that the assessee failed to substantiate the ‘on-money’ receipts.” (iv) Ground no.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.318/SRT/22 for A.Y.2017-18, ground No.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.319/SRT/22 for A Y 2018-19 and ground No.1 raised

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC, VAPI vs. M/S. M POONAM DEVELOPERS, VALSAD

In the result, these Cross-Objections Nos

ITA 285/SRT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

68 of the Act, which is to be taxed under the provisions u/s 115BBE of the Act, despite the fact that the assessee failed to substantiate the ‘on-money’ receipts.” (iv) Ground no.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.318/SRT/22 for A.Y.2017-18, ground No.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.319/SRT/22 for A Y 2018-19 and ground No.1 raised

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC, VAPI, VAPI vs. POONAM DEVELOPERS LLP, DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI (UT)

In the result, these Cross-Objections Nos

ITA 318/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

68 of the Act, which is to be taxed under the provisions u/s 115BBE of the Act, despite the fact that the assessee failed to substantiate the ‘on-money’ receipts.” (iv) Ground no.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.318/SRT/22 for A.Y.2017-18, ground No.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.319/SRT/22 for A Y 2018-19 and ground No.1 raised

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC, VAPI, VAPI vs. POONAM DEVELOPERS LLP, DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI (UT)

In the result, these Cross-Objections Nos

ITA 319/SRT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

68 of the Act, which is to be taxed under the provisions u/s 115BBE of the Act, despite the fact that the assessee failed to substantiate the ‘on-money’ receipts.” (iv) Ground no.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.318/SRT/22 for A.Y.2017-18, ground No.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.319/SRT/22 for A Y 2018-19 and ground No.1 raised

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC, VAPI vs. M/S. M POONAM DEVELOPERS, VALSAD

In the result, these Cross-Objections Nos

ITA 286/SRT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

68 of the Act, which is to be taxed under the provisions u/s 115BBE of the Act, despite the fact that the assessee failed to substantiate the ‘on-money’ receipts.” (iv) Ground no.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.318/SRT/22 for A.Y.2017-18, ground No.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.319/SRT/22 for A Y 2018-19 and ground No.1 raised

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC, VAPI, VAPI vs. POONAM DEVELOPERS LLP, DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI (UT)

In the result, these Cross-Objections Nos

ITA 320/SRT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

68 of the Act, which is to be taxed under the provisions u/s 115BBE of the Act, despite the fact that the assessee failed to substantiate the ‘on-money’ receipts.” (iv) Ground no.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.318/SRT/22 for A.Y.2017-18, ground No.1 raised by the Revenue in ITA No.319/SRT/22 for A Y 2018-19 and ground No.1 raised

M/S. MAYUR CONSTRUCTION,,VALSAD vs. THE ACIT., VALSAD RANGE,, VALSAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1042/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Nov 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No. 1042/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mayur Construction, V The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Valsad. 110, Amar Chamber,Valsad. S [Pan: Aadfm 9859 L] . अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 133ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80I

68,55,671/- and the taxes on such income has Mayur Construction Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Valsad/ ITA No. 1042/AHD/2016 for A.Y. 2010-11 been paid. Therefore, the assessee cannot be subjected to double taxation. 6. The undisputed facts emerged from the above discussion is that the assessee is engaged in the business of construction. The assessee has been showing

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, SURAT vs. M/S. TRANSIT GEO SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3330/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.3330/Ahd/2016 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Court Hearing) D.C.I.T., Circle-2(1)(1), M/S Transit Geo Systems Integrator Pvt. Ltd., 13-C-404, 1St Floor, Room No.223, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Parshvanath Complex, Above Bhakti Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Automobiles, Udhna, Magdalla Road, Surat-395017 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadct 4158 N (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Mishra– CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2) of the Act on 08.08.2013 and duly served upon the assessee. Subsequently, notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 16.01.2014 and duly served upon the assessee. During the assessment proceedings, the assessing officer noted that assessee has issued shares to eleven (11) parties which are either directors himself or their family members or the employees

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VAPI, VAPI vs. POONAM DEVELOPERS, VALSAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 27/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.15/Srt/2021 & 27/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/S. Poonam Developers, Vs. The Acit, Central Circle-1, 402, Amar Chambers, Opp. Lal Vapi. School, Station Road, Valsad- 396001. (Assessee) (Revenue) The Acit, Central Circle-1, Vs. M/S. Poonam Developers, Vapi. 402, Amar Chambers, Opp. Lal School, Station Road, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfm9582G (Revenue) (Assessee) Shri Hardik Vora, Ar Assessee By Shri Sita Ram Meena, Sr. Dr Respondent By 11/02/2022 Date Of Hearing 06/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(3)Section 68

55,200/- i.e. 20% of Rs.2,57,76,000/- as profit of assessee. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above addition/disallowance made by the assessing Officer may please be deleted. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 5. Succinct facts are that

POONAM DEVELOPERS,VALSAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VAPI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 15/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.15/Srt/2021 & 27/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/S. Poonam Developers, Vs. The Acit, Central Circle-1, 402, Amar Chambers, Opp. Lal Vapi. School, Station Road, Valsad- 396001. (Assessee) (Revenue) The Acit, Central Circle-1, Vs. M/S. Poonam Developers, Vapi. 402, Amar Chambers, Opp. Lal School, Station Road, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfm9582G (Revenue) (Assessee) Shri Hardik Vora, Ar Assessee By Shri Sita Ram Meena, Sr. Dr Respondent By 11/02/2022 Date Of Hearing 06/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(3)Section 68

55,200/- i.e. 20% of Rs.2,57,76,000/- as profit of assessee. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above addition/disallowance made by the assessing Officer may please be deleted. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 5. Succinct facts are that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT, SURAT vs. JAYANTIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BABARIYA, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 297/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.297/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Virtual Court Hearing) Assistant Commissioner Of Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, Income-Tax, Circle-2, Surat, Vs. K-801, River View Heights, Room No.503, 5Th Floor, Aayakar Pedar Road, Mota Varachha, Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- Surat-394101 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpb 0820 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwin K Parekh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 251(1)(a)Section 69

68,000/- in the assessment order passed for A.Y.2018- 19 and did not made the additions of Rs.41,67,45,000/- as made in the assessment order under consideration. These facts clearly prove that the additions made by the Assessing Officer only on the basis of sauda chithi are not justified. Hence, deserves to be deleted. The DVO's report

SHRI JAYANTIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BABARIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue (in ITA nos

ITA 110/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.110/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, Vs. The Acit, Central Circle-2, K-801, River View Heights, Surat. Peddar Road, Mota Varachha, Surat-394101 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpb0820M (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.195/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) The Dcit, Central Circle-2, Vs. Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, K-801, River View Heights, Surat. Peddar Road, Mota Varachha, Surat-394101 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpb0820M (Assessee) (Respondent) Shri Ashwin K. Parekh, Ar Assessee By Respondent By Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 07/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/11/2022

Section 143(3)

68,000/- in the assessment order passed for A.Y.2018-19 and did not made the additions of Rs.41,67,45,000/- as made in the assessment order under consideration. These facts clearly prove that the additions made by the Assessing Officer only on the basis of sauda chithi are not justified. Hence, deserves to be deleted. The DVO's report further

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.-2, SURAT vs. SHRI JAYANTIBHAI VIRJIBHAI BABARIYA, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue (in ITA nos

ITA 195/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.110/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, Vs. The Acit, Central Circle-2, K-801, River View Heights, Surat. Peddar Road, Mota Varachha, Surat-394101 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpb0820M (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.195/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) The Dcit, Central Circle-2, Vs. Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, K-801, River View Heights, Surat. Peddar Road, Mota Varachha, Surat-394101 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpb0820M (Assessee) (Respondent) Shri Ashwin K. Parekh, Ar Assessee By Respondent By Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 07/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/11/2022

Section 143(3)

68,000/- in the assessment order passed for A.Y.2018-19 and did not made the additions of Rs.41,67,45,000/- as made in the assessment order under consideration. These facts clearly prove that the additions made by the Assessing Officer only on the basis of sauda chithi are not justified. Hence, deserves to be deleted. The DVO's report further