Search: section 68

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 35Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi12 Pune9 Ahmedabad8 Karnataka4 Surat3 Jaipur2 Cuttack2 Mumbai2 Bangalore2 Telangana1 SC1 Kolkata1 Cochin1

Key Topics

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

ITA 164/SRT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

68 of A-23, expenses relating to Capital\nPalace project were also found.\nThe learned AO had assumed the word “Capital” as contribution of capital instead of\nbooking of Capital Palace.\n1.18 The Respondent urges that the project called Capital Palace / Gopnath is also\nsituated far away from the city area and, therefore, booking amount as well as margin

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

ITA 163/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Section 147Section 250

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT