Search: section 68

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur40 Mumbai26 Delhi26 Chennai21 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad16 Hyderabad16 Indore12 Pune11 Visakhapatnam10 Kolkata9 Agra8 Surat7 Bangalore6 Chandigarh5 Rajkot4 Ranchi3 Jabalpur2 Cuttack2 Nagpur2 SC1 Cochin1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 26345 Section 143(3)15 Section 153C11 Section 271D6 Section 254(1)5 Section 133A5 Section 142(1)5 Survey u/s 133A5 Limitation/Time-bar5 Section 269S

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 91/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263Section 271DSection 40

68 to 69 of the act. The ld. PCIT also noted that the assessee in addition to on money must have generated some profit from allotment of plots to customers. On the various observation made by ld. PCIT, the ld AR for the assessee submits that assessee has duly accounted each and every entry of the impounded materials and prepared

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

THE ITO, WARD -1,, SURAT vs. SHREE MADHI SURALI VIBHAG NAGRIK SAHAKARI DHIRAN MANDLI LTD., SURAT

SHRI JIVRAJBHAI H. BALAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(2),, SURAT