BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai192Bangalore114Delhi90Chennai50Kolkata48Ahmedabad21Cuttack14Jaipur14Cochin12Indore9Raipur6Pune6Hyderabad6Rajkot4Chandigarh4Surat3Agra2Allahabad2Jodhpur2Lucknow2Karnataka1Jabalpur1Ranchi1SC1Guwahati1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 44A3Section 194J3Addition to Income3Section 40A(2)(b)2TDS2Natural Justice2

M/S. K.N. DIAMOND,,BILIMORA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAVSARI CIRCLE,, NAVSARI

ITA 1788/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1788/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S K.N.Diamond, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Soniwad, Bilimora, Of Income Tax, Navsari Navsari – 396 321. Circle, Navsari. [Pan: Aadfk 3167 H] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओर से /Assessee By Shri Parimalsinh Parmar – Advocate राज"वक"ओर से /Revenue By Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.Dr

Section 194JSection 40Section 40A(2)(b)

194J. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The ld. AR for the assessee submits that it is not a case of “non-deduction” of tax at source, rather it is a case of “short deduction” of tax at source. The ld. AR for the assessee further submitted that the assessing officer is factually incorrect in stating

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL CO. PVT LTD,SURAT vs. PCIT-1, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 541/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.541/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Engineering Professional Co. Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Pcit -1, 444, Royal Arcade, Opp. Sarthana Zoo, Surat Varachha Road, Near Sarthana Jakatnaka, Surat – 395006, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabce0313Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri P. M. Jagasheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 13/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19/02/2025

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

section 263 of the Act and referred to the decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Courts in the cases of Malabar Industries Ltd. vs. CIT, 243 ITR 83 (SC), CIT vs. Pavilee Projects Pvt. Ltd., 149 taxman.com 115 (SC), CIT vs. Nagesh Neatwears Pvt. Ltd., 345 ITR 135 (Delhi), ITO vs. D. G. Housing Projcts

S M CONSTRUCTION,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 539/SRT/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Jan 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Viral Marfatia, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Jayshree Thakur, Sr. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143Section 148Section 194JSection 44A

section addition was made. (4) That, the Assessing officer failed to appreciate the facts of the case in the right perspective and order is issued without considering the reply of appellant, without issuing speaking order. Order issued was against the natural justice and need to be deleted. (5) That, without prejudice to above, an addition of Rs.275,378 being