BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi14Surat8Raipur6Mumbai6Pune5Amritsar5Jaipur3Ahmedabad3Bangalore3Lucknow3Chennai2Kolkata1Agra1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 55A24Section 143(3)8Section 1478Section 1488Section 50C8Long Term Capital Gains8Reassessment8

SANMUKHLAL NANUBHAI MODI HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 550/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

NITIN KUMAR GAMANLAL MODI HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 551/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

VIJAYKUMAR GAMANLAL MODI, HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 545/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

GAMANLAL NANUBHAI MODI HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 546/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

MADHUBEN DILIPBHAI MODI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 547/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

ANILKUMAR GAMANLAL MODI, HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 548/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

JIGNESHKUMAR S. MODI HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 544/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting

NIKUNJKUMAR D. MODI HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 549/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Viresh I. Rudalal (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.P.K. Panda (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

55A w.e.f. 01/07/2012. 3. That the CIT(A) erred in treating the registered valuer’s report as fallacious & erroneous.” ITA No. 544-551/SRT/2018 Sh. Jigneshkumar S. Modi HUF, Surat vs. ITO, Bardoli 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r/w section 147 wherein long term capital gain amounting