ENVIRO TECHNOLOGY LIMITED,,ANKLESHWAR vs. THE ACIT.,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Bharuch Enviro Deputy Commissioner Of Infrastructure Ltd.117-118, Income Tax, Bharuch Vs Gidc Estate-393002 Circle, Pan : Aaacb 8075 F Assessee / Appellant Revenue /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These four appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-VI, Baroda / Commissioner of Income-tax-3, Vadodara [‘CIT(A)’ for short] dated 10.11.2014, 03.03.2014 & 08.03.2017 for assessment years (AY) 2006-07 & 2007-08 respectively. With the consent of parties

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANKLESHWAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BHARUCH

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Bharuch Enviro Deputy Commissioner Of Infrastructure Ltd.117-118, Income Tax, Bharuch Vs Gidc Estate-393002 Circle, Pan : Aaacb 8075 F Assessee / Appellant Revenue /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These four appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-VI, Baroda / Commissioner of Income-tax-3, Vadodara [‘CIT(A)’ for short] dated 10.11.2014, 03.03.2014 & 08.03.2017 for assessment years (AY) 2006-07 & 2007-08 respectively. With the consent of parties

SHRI ASHISH NATVARLAL VASHI,,NA vs. ARIVS.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, NAVSARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.3522/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2007-08) (Virtual Court Hearing) Ashish Natvarlal Vashi, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Tolat Falia, At & Post. Kaccholi, Navsari. Taluka Gandevi, Dist: Navsari, Navsari - 396370. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abypv5202C (Assessee) (Respondent)

u/s 148 of the IT. Act, 1961.” 3. At the outset, ld Counsel for the assessee requested the Bench that additional ground raised by the assessee goes to the root of the matter therefore it should be adjudicated first. In such additional ground, the assessee has challenged the validity of reopening the assessment under section 147

SHRI ASHUTOSH CHANDRAKANT PATEL,,U.T. OF DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI vs. THE ACIT.,VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Ashutosh Chandrakant Patel, The Assistant “Ashutosh” Commissioner Of Income Vs Near Power House, Zanda Chowk, Tax, Vapi Circle, Vapi. Silvassa, U.T. Of D. & N.H, Pan : Agmpp 3734 C Assessee / Appellant Revenue /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini-AM: This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-Valsad, dated 10.11.2014 for Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal: “01. On appreciation of the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Learned Commissioner

M/S. SHREE GURJARI INDUSTRIES LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE DCIT,, SURAT

In the result, ground No. 1of the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Gurjari Industries The Deputy Commissioner Of Ltd., Am-4, Prsident Plaza, Nr. Income Tax,Circle-2(1)(2), Vs Rto, Ring Road, Surat-395 002 Room No. 323, Pan : Abjfs2664J Aaykarbhavan, Majura Gate, Surat Appellant /Assessee Respondent / Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PERPAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-II, Surat dated 03.02.2016for assessment year (AY) 2007-08.The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. On the circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned

M/S. BASE INDUSTRIES LTD.,SILVASSA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, VAPI WARD -1, VAPI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These two appeals by same assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), Valsad dated 15.03.2013 and 02.07.2016 for assessment year (AY) 2004-05. In ITA No.1581/AHD/2013 the assessee has challenged the addition in quantum assessment and validity of re-opening under

RAMBILASH RAJARAM JAJOO,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(2)(4), SURAT

In the result, assessee's appeal is allowed

254(1) of Income Tax Act\nPER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:\n1. These two appeals by separate assessee are directed against the separate\norders of Addl/JCIT(A)-7, Kolkata/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for\nshort to as \"NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)] dated 21.03.2024 and 21.04.2023 for same\n assessment year i.e., (AY) 2011-12, which in turn arises out of separate\nassessment

SUNITA JAJOO,SURAT vs. ITO WARD 2(2)(4), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 552/Srt/2024 (Ay 2011-12) (Physical Court Hearing) Rambilash Rajaram Jajoo Income Tax Officer, Ward- 429-432, Golden Point, Falsawadi, 2(2)(4), Aaykar Bhawan, Majura बनाम Ring Road, Surat City, Gate, Opp. New Civil Hospital, Vs Surat-395 002 Surat-395 001 [Pan : Aampj 0040 K] अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These two appeals by separate assessee are directed against the separate orders of Addl/JCIT(A)-7, Kolkata/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short to as “NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)] dated 21.03.2024 and 21.04.2023 for same assessment year i.e., (AY) 2011-12, which in turn arises out of separate assessment orders

BHAKTIKISHOREDAS DHARMTANYADASJI SWAMI,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VAPI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Bhaktikishoredas I.T.O., Dharmtanyadasji Swami, Ward-1, Vs. Shri Swaminarayan Seva Trust, Vapi. Swaminarayan Gurukul, Gurukul Road, Chala, Vapi, Gujarat India-396191. Pan No. Bmgps 5746 G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 19/05/2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal

SHANKARLAL C SHAH,,SURAT vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue (in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1359 & 1481/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shankarlal C. Shah, The Acit, Central Circle-4, Vs. 199-201, Vishal Nagar Society, Surat. Udhna, Magdalla Road, Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aeups4161E The Dcit, Central Circle-1, Vs. Manish Kashiram Patel, Surat. 15-16, Vanita Residency, Althan Canal Road, Althan, Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ablpp5085E (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Appellant)

254 of the Act the Tribunal has jurisdiction to examine a question of law which though not arose before lower authorities but arose before it from facts as found by lower authorities and having a bearing on tax liability of assessee. Therefore, we do not agree with contention of ld DR for the Revenue to the effect that assessee cannot

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, SURAT vs. SHRI MANISH KASHIRAM PATEL,, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue (in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1359 & 1481/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shankarlal C. Shah, The Acit, Central Circle-4, Vs. 199-201, Vishal Nagar Society, Surat. Udhna, Magdalla Road, Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aeups4161E The Dcit, Central Circle-1, Vs. Manish Kashiram Patel, Surat. 15-16, Vanita Residency, Althan Canal Road, Althan, Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ablpp5085E (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Appellant)

254 of the Act the Tribunal has jurisdiction to examine a question of law which though not arose before lower authorities but arose before it from facts as found by lower authorities and having a bearing on tax liability of assessee. Therefore, we do not agree with contention of ld DR for the Revenue to the effect that assessee cannot

RAJLAXMI POLYMERS PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1),, SURAT

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Court Hearing) Vs Rajlaxmi Polymers Pvt Ltd, Income Tax Officer, 5024,World Trade Centre, Ward -2 (1)(1), Near Udhna Darwaja, Surat, Ring Road, Surat-395002 Pan : Aabcr 1210 M Assessee Revenue Assessee By Sh. Sapnesh Sheth Ca/Ar Revenue By Ms. Anupma Singla Sr Dr Date Of Hearing 17/12/2020 Date Of Pronouncement 21/12/2020

254(1) of Income-tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee under section 253 of Income-tax Act (Act) is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Surat, [in short “learned Commissioner (Appeals)”] dated 14.07.2016 pertaining to Assessment Years (AYs) 2010-11. 2. Brief facts of the case

VIVEK KHABIA,SURAT vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, ground No. 3 is allowed and ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1072/Srt/2024 (Ay 2018-19) (Physical Court Hearing) Vivek Khabia Income Tax Officer, Ward- H.No.1187-90-91, 1089, Office 2(3)(4), Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, बनाम No.411, New Dtc Gheekanta Majura Gate, Surat-395 001 Vs Road, Nr. Bhavani Vad Temple, Haripura, Surat-395 003 [Pan : Avspk 5724 E] अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi/Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) [for short to as “NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)] dated 30.08.2024 for assessment year (AY) 2018-19, which in turn arises out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section 147

NARPATSINH PRABHATSINH SOLANKI,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the is allowed for statistical purposes

254(1) of Income Tax Act\nPER DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:\nThis appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal\nCentre (NFAC), Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) [for short, “Ld. CIT(A)"]\ndated 08.08.2024 for the assessment year 2011-12, which in turn arises out of an\nassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer

PISTABEN RAJMAL JAIN,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(3), SURAT

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar, Hon’Ble & Ms. Suchitra Kambleita Nos. 635 & 703/Srt/2025 A. Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15

reassessment. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned assessing officer has erred in making an addition of Rs. 17,750/- as unrecorded payment of commission u/s. 69C without any evidences and base purely on guess work. 5. On the facts and circumstances as well as law on the subject

PISTABEN RAJMAL JAIN,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(3), SURAT

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar, Hon’Ble & Ms. Suchitra Kambleita Nos. 635 & 703/Srt/2025 A. Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15

reassessment. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned assessing officer has erred in making an addition of Rs. 17,750/- as unrecorded payment of commission u/s. 69C without any evidences and base purely on guess work. 5. On the facts and circumstances as well as law on the subject

THE AMROLI VIBHAG VIVIDH KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDLI LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result ground No. 2 of the appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

254 of the Act. 6. On further appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), the action of Assessing Officer was upheld. The Ld. CIT(A) vide confirming the action of Assessing Officer also recorded that before Tribunal, the Ld. AR of the assessee claimed that none of the payment made by assessee was exceeding Rs.20,000/- in a single

THE AMROLI VIBHAG VIVIDH KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDLI LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-6,, SURAT

In the result ground No. 2 of the appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

254 of the Act. 6. On further appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), the action of Assessing Officer was upheld. The Ld. CIT(A) vide confirming the action of Assessing Officer also recorded that before Tribunal, the Ld. AR of the assessee claimed that none of the payment made by assessee was exceeding Rs.20,000/- in a single

THE AMROLI VIBHAG VIVIDH KARYAKARI SAHAKARI MANDLI LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result ground No. 2 of the appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

254 of the Act. 6. On further appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), the action of Assessing Officer was upheld. The Ld. CIT(A) vide confirming the action of Assessing Officer also recorded that before Tribunal, the Ld. AR of the assessee claimed that none of the payment made by assessee was exceeding Rs.20,000/- in a single