BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 159clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi472Mumbai271Jaipur138Ahmedabad126Bangalore119Chennai93Kolkata82Pune42Raipur37Nagpur30Chandigarh29Guwahati28Visakhapatnam23Telangana23Hyderabad22Allahabad20Indore17Lucknow16Amritsar16Cuttack14Cochin13Rajkot10Surat10Patna7Jabalpur7Jodhpur4Orissa2Rajasthan1Panaji1Uttarakhand1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14823Section 271D12Section 1479Section 143(3)7Section 1447Addition to Income7Limitation/Time-bar5Section 269S4Section 271F

BETEX INDIA LIMITED,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 171/SRT/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed ITA Nos.52/SRT/2022 & 171, 174/SRT/2021/IT(SS)A 69, 70, 75 & 76/SRT/2021 Betex India Ltd. & Dhanpriya Prints Pvt. Ltd. under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. Therefore, considering these facts and circumstances we dismiss the appeal of the assessee. 28. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee (In ITA No.171/SRT/2021

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT, SURAT vs. DHANPRIYA PRINTS PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

4
Section 271(1)(b)4
Penalty4
Reassessment3
ITA 52/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed ITA Nos.52/SRT/2022 & 171, 174/SRT/2021/IT(SS)A 69, 70, 75 & 76/SRT/2021 Betex India Ltd. & Dhanpriya Prints Pvt. Ltd. under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. Therefore, considering these facts and circumstances we dismiss the appeal of the assessee. 28. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee (In ITA No.171/SRT/2021

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. BETEX INDIA LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 174/SRT/2021[2008-9]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed ITA Nos.52/SRT/2022 & 171, 174/SRT/2021/IT(SS)A 69, 70, 75 & 76/SRT/2021 Betex India Ltd. & Dhanpriya Prints Pvt. Ltd. under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. Therefore, considering these facts and circumstances we dismiss the appeal of the assessee. 28. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee (In ITA No.171/SRT/2021

SHRI HARESH P. SHAH, L/H OF LATE MANJULA P. SHAH,,VALSAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,, VALSAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 894/AHD/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.894/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2006-07) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sh. Haresh P. Shah, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Legal Heir, Late Manjula P. Shah, Valsad Ram, Appartment, I/A, Block No.4, 1St Floor, Opp. Ramwadi, Valsad, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ayeps2205H (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rasesh Shah - Ca Respondent By : Ms Anupama Singla – Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06/11/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini:

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah - CAFor Respondent: Ms Anupama Singla – Sr. DR
Section 120Section 124Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 292B

147 of the Income Tax Act/ 1961………” The notice under section 148 was issued on the dead person, Smt. Manjulaben Prabhudas Shah, on 22.03.2013, ( she died on 17.12.2005), and it is also clear that notice under section 148 was issued after her death. 6. In response to notice under section 148 of the Act, the Authorised Representative of the deceased

SHRI PRUTHVIRAJSINH ABHESINH THAKOR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(1),, SURAT

In the result ground not 1 and 2 of this appeal are allowed

ITA 1631/AHD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

147 of the Income Tax Act dated 28.01.2016. He stated that in view of the ITAT order dated 11.09.2017 in which the ITAT has quashed the assessment in dispute on which the penalty in dispute has been levied. The penalty in dispute is not sustainable and may be cancelled. He also filed a copy of order of ITAT dated

SHRI PRUTHVIRAJSINH ABHESINH THAKOR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(1),, SURAT

In the result ground not 1 and 2 of this appeal are allowed

ITA 1630/AHD/2017[2008-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2019AY 2008-19

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

147 of the Income Tax Act dated 28.01.2016. He stated that in view of the ITAT order dated 11.09.2017 in which the ITAT has quashed the assessment in dispute on which the penalty in dispute has been levied. The penalty in dispute is not sustainable and may be cancelled. He also filed a copy of order of ITAT dated

DESIGNER EXIM PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 1(1)(2), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 14/SRT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) M/S Designer Exim Pvt. Ltd., I.T.O., D-1203, Panchsheel Heights, Opp.- Ward 1(1)(2), Vs. Pizza Hut, Mahavir Nagar, Kandivali Surat. West, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400067 Pan No. Aabcd 4298 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 254(1)

u/s 148 of the Act. (c) The learned Assessing Officer failed to obtain sanction of the prescribed authority before issuing notice under section 148 of the Act. (d) The initiation of proceeding under section 147 of the Act and issuance of notice under section 148 is without jurisdiction, bad in law and contrary to the provisions

SANGEETA GOEL L/H SURENDRA PRAKASH JAIN,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(5), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 924/SRT/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat08 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth Assessment Year 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 69A

147 may please be quashed and/or orders of the lower authorities may please be set aside. 5 Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 3. The assessee did not file return of income for assessment year 2009-10. On the basis of AIR information

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 710/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 269SSection 271D

reassessment proceedings. I.T.A No. 709 & 710//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2009-10 Page No 3 Anand Mahendra Kapadia vs. ITO The assessing officer found that there is an entry of interest paid of Rs.2,97,600, therefore made the same as addition and also proposed for penalty proceedings u/s. 271D and 271E of the Act for violations of provisions of Section 269SS

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 709/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 269SSection 271D

reassessment proceedings. I.T.A No. 709 & 710//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2009-10 Page No 3 Anand Mahendra Kapadia vs. ITO The assessing officer found that there is an entry of interest paid of Rs.2,97,600, therefore made the same as addition and also proposed for penalty proceedings u/s. 271D and 271E of the Act for violations of provisions of Section 269SS