GAURAVA MISHRA,RAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(8), SURAT
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 104/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Nov 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.104/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Gaurav Mishra, Vs. Ito, Present Address: - Ward -3 (2)(8), 80, Bayshore Road, Unit No.28, Surat (Costa Del Sol), Singapore – 46992 Permanent Address: 605, Spathik Shilla, Sundar Nagar Purani Basti, So Raipur – 492001, C.G., India "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Amkpm6042J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Veekass Sharma, Ar Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 04/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 17/11/2025
Section 127Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 148Section 250
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was also separately initiated for concealment of income.
5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The appeal was delayed by 30 days before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) condoned the delay and adjudicate of the issue. The appellant raised various grounds
