BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 32(1)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Delhi32Raipur30Bangalore21Chennai17Indore9Kolkata8Jaipur7Cuttack6Guwahati5Surat3Ahmedabad2Chandigarh2Cochin2Hyderabad2Lucknow2Rajkot1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Limitation/Time-bar3Condonation of Delay3

BETEX INDIA LIMITED,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 171/SRT/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

32. Learned DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue stated before us that during the assessment proceedings the assessee has not furnished complete details and these companies are neither traceable nor their credentials were ascertainable from the neighbour individuals/ concerns therefore identity of these share subscribing companies have not been proved. Hence addition made by AO must ITA Nos.52/SRT/2022

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. BETEX INDIA LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 174/SRT/2021[2008-9]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

32. Learned DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue stated before us that during the assessment proceedings the assessee has not furnished complete details and these companies are neither traceable nor their credentials were ascertainable from the neighbour individuals/ concerns therefore identity of these share subscribing companies have not been proved. Hence addition made by AO must ITA Nos.52/SRT/2022

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT, SURAT vs. DHANPRIYA PRINTS PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 52/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

32. Learned DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue stated before us that during the assessment proceedings the assessee has not furnished complete details and these companies are neither traceable nor their credentials were ascertainable from the neighbour individuals/ concerns therefore identity of these share subscribing companies have not been proved. Hence addition made by AO must ITA Nos.52/SRT/2022