Search: reassessment

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 201(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1488 Section 2637 Section 12A5 Section 1475 Section 50C4 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 254(1)2 Section 143(1)2 Section 139(1)

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1238/SRT/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: of Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT DR

Section 12ASection 143(1)

reassessment not valid on mere allegation of a delayed digital filing of Form 10. While passing the order, Delhi High Court made the following observations: 32. We further note that a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court has in its decision rendered after the insertion of the 2015 Act and the 2016 Amendment Rules in Association of Indian Panelboard

RANG AVDHUT MANDIR TRUST,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, BARDOLI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

RANG AVDHUT MANDIR TRUST,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, BARDOLI

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

RANG AVDHUT MANDIR TRUST,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, BARDOLI

VISHNUBHAI CHELABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. PCIT, SURAT-1, SURAT, SURAT

ARVINDKUMAR MAHENDRAKUMAR GOYAL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), SURAT

MEDINNOVA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2(1)(2), SURAT