SHRI RAVJIBHAI B. DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

reassessment proceedings should not be initiated against the assessee. The said argument of the Ld. Counsel cannot be accepted because the case of the assessee firm was not scrutinized in assessment year 2007-08, therefore Assessing Officer did not get opportunity to verify books of accounts, documents and evidences. For assessee year 2008-09, the assessee did not submit books

SHRI RAVJIBHAI B. DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

reassessment proceedings should not be initiated against the assessee. The said argument of the Ld. Counsel cannot be accepted because the case of the assessee firm was not scrutinized in assessment year 2007-08, therefore Assessing Officer did not get opportunity to verify books of accounts, documents and evidences. For assessee year 2008-09, the assessee did not submit books

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

reassessment proceedings should not be initiated against the assessee. The said argument of the Ld. Counsel cannot be accepted because the case of the assessee firm was not scrutinized in assessment year 2007-08, therefore Assessing Officer did not get opportunity to verify books of accounts, documents and evidences. For assessee year 2008-09, the assessee did not submit books

SHRI RAVJIBHAI B. DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

reassessment proceedings should not be initiated against the assessee. The said argument of the Ld. Counsel cannot be accepted because the case of the assessee firm was not scrutinized in assessment year 2007-08, therefore Assessing Officer did not get opportunity to verify books of accounts, documents and evidences. For assessee year 2008-09, the assessee did not submit books

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

reassessment proceedings should not be initiated against the assessee. The said argument of the Ld. Counsel cannot be accepted because the case of the assessee firm was not scrutinized in assessment year 2007-08, therefore Assessing Officer did not get opportunity to verify books of accounts, documents and evidences. For assessee year 2008-09, the assessee did not submit books

ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT vs. ANSHUMAN RAMDAYALJI KUMAWAT, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

reassessment under section 147 of the Act cannot be entertained and it is hereby rejected. Rajesh Kr. Pamecha, Mukesh M. Sen, Anshuman M. Kumawat 21. We Note that on merit, the assessee`s case is squarely covered by the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Pankaj K. Chaudhary, in ITA No. 1152/AHD/2017, dated

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI RAJESH KUMAR PAMECHA, AJMER

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

reassessment under section 147 of the Act cannot be entertained and it is hereby rejected. Rajesh Kr. Pamecha, Mukesh M. Sen, Anshuman M. Kumawat 21. We Note that on merit, the assessee`s case is squarely covered by the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Pankaj K. Chaudhary, in ITA No. 1152/AHD/2017, dated

ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT vs. ANSHUMAN RAMDAYALJI KUMAWAT, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

reassessment under section 147 of the Act cannot be entertained and it is hereby rejected. Rajesh Kr. Pamecha, Mukesh M. Sen, Anshuman M. Kumawat 21. We Note that on merit, the assessee`s case is squarely covered by the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Pankaj K. Chaudhary, in ITA No. 1152/AHD/2017, dated

ITO, WARD 2(3)(8), SURAT vs. MUKESH MAHAVIRPRASAD SEN, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

reassessment under section 147 of the Act cannot be entertained and it is hereby rejected. Rajesh Kr. Pamecha, Mukesh M. Sen, Anshuman M. Kumawat 21. We Note that on merit, the assessee`s case is squarely covered by the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Pankaj K. Chaudhary, in ITA No. 1152/AHD/2017, dated

ITO, WARD 2(3)(8), SURAT vs. MUKESH MAHAVIRPRASAD SEN, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

reassessment under section 147 of the Act cannot be entertained and it is hereby rejected. Rajesh Kr. Pamecha, Mukesh M. Sen, Anshuman M. Kumawat 21. We Note that on merit, the assessee`s case is squarely covered by the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Pankaj K. Chaudhary, in ITA No. 1152/AHD/2017, dated

ITO, WARD-2(2)(3), SURAT vs. MAHESHCHAND G. PATEL (HUF), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) I.T.O., Maheshchandra G. Patel (Huf), Ward-2(2)(3), 22, Vrajbhumi, Tirumala Society, In Vs. Surat. Front Of Balaji Nagar, Piplod, Surat. Pan No. Aajhm 2315 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

reassessment proceedings, recorded that during the search proceedings, certain incriminating material was seized vide Annexure A-1 and page No. 117 to 119 thereof, the actual rate of land was Rs. 15,777 per square yard, of land admeasuring 9927 square yard, (15,777 x 9927) on the basis of which the figure of on money of Rs. 15.26 crores

AAKASH IMPEX,SURAT vs. ITO-2(3)(7), MAJURA GATE, SURAT

In the result the ground No

reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer may be upheld. 5. In addition to this, Learned Departmental Representative (ld. DR) submits that assessee’s case under consideration is covered by the judgment of the Co- ordinate Bench of ITAT, Surat in the case of Shri Pankaj Jain Chaudhury in ITA No.1152/AHD/2017, order dated 29.09.2021, wherein the Co-ordinate Bench

DCIT.CENTRAL CIR.- 3(3),, SURAT vs. ANJANA EXPORTS, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.516/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Court Hearing) Anjana Exports, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-3(3), 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. Gk Chambers, Surat. Varachha Road, Surat-395006. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadfa0943R आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.536/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Court Hearing) The Dcit, Circle-3(3), Vs. Anjana Exports, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. Gk Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat-395006. (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Assessee) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadfa0943R Assessee By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 12/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14 /11/2022

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. As observed earlier not only there existed new information with the AO from the credible sources, but also he had applied his mind and recorded the conclusion that the purchases claimed were non-genuine and therefore bogus, (clearly meaning that what was disclosed was false

AJANTA EXPORTS,SURAT vs. DCIT.CENTRAL CIR.- 3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.516/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Court Hearing) Anjana Exports, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-3(3), 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. Gk Chambers, Surat. Varachha Road, Surat-395006. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadfa0943R आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.536/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Court Hearing) The Dcit, Circle-3(3), Vs. Anjana Exports, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. Gk Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat-395006. (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Assessee) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadfa0943R Assessee By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 12/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14 /11/2022

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. As observed earlier not only there existed new information with the AO from the credible sources, but also he had applied his mind and recorded the conclusion that the purchases claimed were non-genuine and therefore bogus, (clearly meaning that what was disclosed was false

SHRI VIMALCHAND JAIN,,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3(3)(5),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

section 147 of the Act and there is no infirmity of the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, therefore reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer should be upheld. On merits, ld DR submits that evidences made available by the Director General of Income Tax (Investigation), Mumbai, prove that entities of Shri Rajendra Jain Group, Shri Sanjay Choudhary Group

SANJAYKUMAR DEVKISHAN PANWAR,,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(8), SURAT, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.569/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Court Hearing) Sanjaykumar Devkishan Panwar, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(8), 207, 2Nd Floor, 6/2060/61 Vedant Surat. Building Bojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aovpp8989A (Revenue)/(Appellant) (Assessee)/(Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.588/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2008-09) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(8), Vs. Sanjaykumar Devkishan Panwar, 207, 2Nd Floor, 6/2060/61 Vedant Surat. Building Bojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aovpp8989A (Revenue)/(Appellant) (Assessee)/(Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Vijayvargia, Ca Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit(Dr) Respondent By Date Of Hearing 03/02/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2023

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. 20. In fact, in three recent judgments; the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has upheld the reopening on similar facts. The case is squarely covered by these judgments which are: Yogendrakumar Gupta vs. ITO 366 ITR 186 (Guj) Peass Industrial Engineers (P) Ltd. 73 taxmann.com

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(8), SURAT, SURAT vs. SANJAYKUMAR DEVKISHAN PANWAR,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.569/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Court Hearing) Sanjaykumar Devkishan Panwar, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(8), 207, 2Nd Floor, 6/2060/61 Vedant Surat. Building Bojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aovpp8989A (Revenue)/(Appellant) (Assessee)/(Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.588/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2008-09) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(8), Vs. Sanjaykumar Devkishan Panwar, 207, 2Nd Floor, 6/2060/61 Vedant Surat. Building Bojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aovpp8989A (Revenue)/(Appellant) (Assessee)/(Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Vijayvargia, Ca Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit(Dr) Respondent By Date Of Hearing 03/02/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2023

reassessment proceedings, if the twin conditions prescribed under Section 147 of the Act are satisfied. 20. In fact, in three recent judgments; the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has upheld the reopening on similar facts. The case is squarely covered by these judgments which are: Yogendrakumar Gupta vs. ITO 366 ITR 186 (Guj) Peass Industrial Engineers (P) Ltd. 73 taxmann.com

ITO, WARD-3(3)(3), SURAT vs. KUSHAL R JAIN, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 420 & 504 /Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2007-08) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shri Gautam Chunilal Jain, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Prop. Of M/S Sai Star, 286, Laxmi Surat. Nagar Society, Nr. Tikam Nagar, Lambe Hanuman Road, Surat. (Assessee) (Revenue) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Vs. Shri Gautam Chunilal Jain, Surat. Prop. Of M/S Sai Star, 286, Laxmi Nagar Society, Nr. Tikam Nagar, Lambe Hanuman Road, Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abhpl0577D (Revenue) (Assessee) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 215/Srt/2020 & 575/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2007-08) Shri Kushal R. Jain, The Ito, Ward-3(3)(3), Vs. Prop. M/S Kunal Gems, C/O. Surat. 901, Rajhans Tower, Mini Bazar, Varachha, Surat. (Assessee) (Revenue) The Ito, Ward-3(3)(3), Vs. Shri Kushal R. Jain, Surat. Prop. M/S Kunal Gems, C/O. 901, Rajhans Tower, Mini Bazar, Varachha, Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Advpj6155B (Revenue) (Assessee) Assessee By Shri Himanshu Gandhi, Ca Shri H. P. Meena, Cit(Dr) Respondent By Date Of Hearing 21/03/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 29/03/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini, Am: Captioned Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessees & Revenue, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2007-08, Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Surat [In Ita. 420 & 504, 575/Srt/2019 & 215/Srt/2020 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Gautam C. Jain & Kushal R. Jain Short “The Ld. Cit(A)”] Which In Turn Arise Out Of Separate Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) R.W.S 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).

172 (Gujarat) 7 Micro Inks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT [2017] 79 taxmann.com 153 (Gujarat) 8 Shakti Karnawat Vs. ITO - 2(3)(8), Surat ITA 1504/Ahd/2017 and 1381 /Ahd/2017 9 Asian Paints Ltd. Vs. DCIT, [2008] 296 ITR 90 (Bombay) 10 PCIT, Surat 1 Vs. Tejua Rohit kumar Kapadia [2018] 94 taxmann.com 325 (SC) ITA. 420 & 504, 575/SRT/2019 & 215/SRT/2020 Assessment Year