SURESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI BHINGARADIA, INDIVIDUAL,BHARUCH vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 355/SRT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Feb 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.355/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Sureshkumar Mavjibhai Bhingaradia, Vs. The Acit, Plot No.3441/B, Near Pci Chowkdi, Circle – 2(1)(1), Gidc Estate, Bharuch - 393002 Vadodara "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Acqpb6047G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Tushar P. Hemani, Sr. Advocate With Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, Advocate Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 01/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/02/2025
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 14ASection 250
14A of the Act mainly because assessee did not reply to the notices issued by AO. Before CIT(A), assessee requested for admission for additional evidences because the CA of the assessee did not respond to the notices of AO despite being apprised of such notices by the assessee. The assessee had also supplied the necessary documents for submission before
