BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

141 results for “reassessment”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,670Mumbai1,285Chennai548Jaipur445Ahmedabad439Kolkata370Bangalore354Pune249Hyderabad242Indore170Chandigarh167Amritsar161Surat141Rajkot127Visakhapatnam122Raipur91Nagpur90Cochin89Agra75Patna61Cuttack48Guwahati46Lucknow44Jodhpur31Allahabad25Jabalpur9Varanasi9Ranchi8Dehradun7Telangana7Panaji5SC4Calcutta4Karnataka3Orissa3Rajasthan2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 148140Section 147113Addition to Income84Section 143(3)71Section 69A71Section 271(1)(c)55Reassessment53Reopening of Assessment41Section 14438

SANJAY SIVABHAGWAN KEYAL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 636/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2009-2010 Sanjay Sivabhagwan Keyal Ito, Ward – 2(3)(4), Flat No.304, 3Rd Floor, Room No.613, Vatika Township, Near Model, Vs. Aaaykar Bhavan, Township, Parvat Patia Majura Gate, Surat - 395010. Surat - 395002. Pan No. Adspk 6097N Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri J.K. Chandnani, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Mr. Rasesh, CA
Section 144Section 148Section 69A

reassessment under section 147 read with section 144 of the Act on 30.09.2016, section 147 read with section 144 of the Act on 30.09.2016, section 147 read with section 144 of the Act on 30.09.2016, bringing to tax the entire cash deposit

Showing 1–20 of 141 · Page 1 of 8

...
Cash Deposit35
Section 6830
Penalty27

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 305/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 306/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 30/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRA CIR.2, SURAT vs. DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA PVT. LTD., SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 51/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 304/SRT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

DAGINA JEWELLERS INDIA (P) LTD,SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 303/SRT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. M/S. DAGINA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., , SURAT

In the result, grounds Nos

ITA 312/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Kiran K. Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) and Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

deposit to the extent of Rs.35,33,091/- as discussed in para 6 of the appeal order. (ii) Ground No.2: CIT(A) erred in assuming addition on account of excess stock found during the survey proceedings to the extent of Rs.4,67,19,066/- as discussed in para 6.3.1 and 6.3.2 of the appeal order.” 38. Ground no.1: During

SHRI ASHISH NATVARLAL VASHI,,NA vs. ARIVS.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, NAVSARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3522/AHD/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Apr 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.3522/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2007-08) (Virtual Court Hearing) Ashish Natvarlal Vashi, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Tolat Falia, At & Post. Kaccholi, Navsari. Taluka Gandevi, Dist: Navsari, Navsari - 396370. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abypv5202C (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Ms Anupama Singla, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 254Section 69A

reassessment proceedings cannot be resorted to only to examine the facts of a case, no matter how desirable that be, unless there is a reason to believe, rather than suspect, that an income has escaped assessment. Thus, just to reopen the assessment, based on the cash deposits

STALIN CHOCKKALINGAM PILLAI,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,VAPI WARD-3,, VAPI

In the result, all the five appeals of the assessee are allowed in the manner as indicted above

ITA 858/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.856, 857 & 858/Ahd/2013/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06 & 2009-10 आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2838 & 2839/Ahd/2014/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05 & 2005-06 Shri Stalin Chockkalingam Pillai, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Flat No. F-102, Rajmoti Complex, Vapi Ward-3, Chharwada Road, Vapi. Vapi – 396 195. [Pan: Aippp 1728 F] (अपीलाथ /Appellant) (!"थ /Respondent)

For Appellant: A.Gopalakrishnan, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri S.R. Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 69A

cash of Rs. 10,000/- deposited at the time of opening the bank account and subsequent deposit of Rs. 50,000/-. The ld. DR has not disputed the fact that the original return assessee declared income of Rs. 1,48,690/- and in the revised return by addition Rs. 70,000/-, the assessee declared amount

SHRI STALIN CHOCKKALINGAM PILLAI,,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,VAPI WARD-3,, VAPI

In the result, all the five appeals of the assessee are allowed in the manner as indicted above

ITA 2839/AHD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.856, 857 & 858/Ahd/2013/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06 & 2009-10 आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2838 & 2839/Ahd/2014/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05 & 2005-06 Shri Stalin Chockkalingam Pillai, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Flat No. F-102, Rajmoti Complex, Vapi Ward-3, Chharwada Road, Vapi. Vapi – 396 195. [Pan: Aippp 1728 F] (अपीलाथ /Appellant) (!"थ /Respondent)

For Appellant: A.Gopalakrishnan, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri S.R. Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 69A

cash of Rs. 10,000/- deposited at the time of opening the bank account and subsequent deposit of Rs. 50,000/-. The ld. DR has not disputed the fact that the original return assessee declared income of Rs. 1,48,690/- and in the revised return by addition Rs. 70,000/-, the assessee declared amount

STALIN CHOCKKALINGAM PILLAI,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,VAPI WARD-3,, VAPI

In the result, all the five appeals of the assessee are allowed in the manner as indicted above

ITA 856/AHD/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.856, 857 & 858/Ahd/2013/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06 & 2009-10 आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2838 & 2839/Ahd/2014/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05 & 2005-06 Shri Stalin Chockkalingam Pillai, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Flat No. F-102, Rajmoti Complex, Vapi Ward-3, Chharwada Road, Vapi. Vapi – 396 195. [Pan: Aippp 1728 F] (अपीलाथ /Appellant) (!"थ /Respondent)

For Appellant: A.Gopalakrishnan, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri S.R. Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 69A

cash of Rs. 10,000/- deposited at the time of opening the bank account and subsequent deposit of Rs. 50,000/-. The ld. DR has not disputed the fact that the original return assessee declared income of Rs. 1,48,690/- and in the revised return by addition Rs. 70,000/-, the assessee declared amount

STALIN CHOCKKALINGAM PILLAI,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,VAPI WARD-3,, VAPI

In the result, all the five appeals of the assessee are allowed in the manner as indicted above

ITA 857/AHD/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.856, 857 & 858/Ahd/2013/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06 & 2009-10 आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2838 & 2839/Ahd/2014/Srt िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2004-05 & 2005-06 Shri Stalin Chockkalingam Pillai, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Flat No. F-102, Rajmoti Complex, Vapi Ward-3, Chharwada Road, Vapi. Vapi – 396 195. [Pan: Aippp 1728 F] (अपीलाथ /Appellant) (!"थ /Respondent)

For Appellant: A.Gopalakrishnan, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri S.R. Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 148Section 69A

cash of Rs. 10,000/- deposited at the time of opening the bank account and subsequent deposit of Rs. 50,000/-. The ld. DR has not disputed the fact that the original return assessee declared income of Rs. 1,48,690/- and in the revised return by addition Rs. 70,000/-, the assessee declared amount

JYOTIBEN KETAN KUMAR RANA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 354/SRT/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.354/Srt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2009-10 Smt. Jyotiben Ketankumar Income Tax Officer, Rana, Ward- 1(2)(2) Surat 79 Jangnath Society, Khatodara Udhna Surat Pan: Akapr 7370 L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 124Section 139Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 3

cash deposits of Rs.14, 82, 000 and cheque deposits of Rs.29,906 in the said bank account. 4. Being, aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT (A). The assessee has filed an additional ground challenging the validity of reopening of assessment before the Ld. CIT (A). However, Ld. CIT (A) Jyotiben Ketankumar Rana

FARHA S. KADRI,BILIMORA vs. ITO, WARD-2, NAVSARI

In the result, the original ground No

ITA 331/SRT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Farha S Kadri, I.T.O. 762, Bazar Street, Bunder Road, Ward-2, Vs. Bilimora (Gujarat)-396321 Navsari. Pan No. Annpk 8150 B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

deposits and also furnished cash flow statement for Financial Year 2009-10. 7. The ld AR for the assessee further submits that he has raised additional ground of appeal. The additional grounds of appeal are legal in nature. The additional grounds of appal may be admitted as no new facts are required to be brought on record for adjudication

VIJAYBHAI MALABHAI BHARWAD,SURAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.,-1(2), SURAT

In the result, ground no.2 raised by the assessee in ITA

ITA 118/SRT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर(खोज-और-ज"ती)अपील सं/It(Ss)A Nos.23 & 24/Srt/2021 (Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14) (Physical Hearing) The Dcit, Vs. Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Central Circle – 3, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Surat. Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.118/Srt/2021 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Vs. The Acit, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Circle -1(2), Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat - 395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.121/Srt/2021 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) The Dcit, Vs. Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Central Circle – 2, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Surat. Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर(खोज-और-ज"ती)अपील सं It(Ss)A Nos.90/Srt/2022 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Vs. The Dcit, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Central Circle – 3, Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat. Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 132Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 68Section 69A

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provision of section 153A of the Act. The Assessing Officer has duly recorded the satisfaction for issuing the notice u/s 153C of the Act. Further, it is not the contention of the assessee that the Assessing Officer has not recorded the satisfaction in the assessee's case

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT vs. VIJAYBHAI MALABHAI BHARWAD, SURAT

In the result, ground no.2 raised by the assessee in ITA

ITA 121/SRT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर(खोज-और-ज"ती)अपील सं/It(Ss)A Nos.23 & 24/Srt/2021 (Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14) (Physical Hearing) The Dcit, Vs. Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Central Circle – 3, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Surat. Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.118/Srt/2021 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Vs. The Acit, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Circle -1(2), Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat - 395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.121/Srt/2021 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) The Dcit, Vs. Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Central Circle – 2, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Surat. Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर(खोज-और-ज"ती)अपील सं It(Ss)A Nos.90/Srt/2022 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Vijaybhai Malabhai Bharwad, Vs. The Dcit, B-58, Chandramani Apartment, Central Circle – 3, Udhana Magdalla Road, Surat. Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aclpv4173C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 132Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 68Section 69A

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provision of section 153A of the Act. The Assessing Officer has duly recorded the satisfaction for issuing the notice u/s 153C of the Act. Further, it is not the contention of the assessee that the Assessing Officer has not recorded the satisfaction in the assessee's case

SHRI HARSHADBHAI VALLABHBHAI PATEL,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, VALSAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 194/SRT/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.194/Srt/2017 & 356/Srt/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 Shri Harshadbhai Vallabhai V. Income Tax Officer, Patel , Ward- 3, Valsad At & Post Tighra, Nava Falia, Via- Dungari Valsad 393 375 Pan: [Afspp 8443 F] अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Rajesh M. Upadhyay, Itp िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Mrs. Anupama Singla, Sr.D.R. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By 09.12.2019 सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 10.12.2019 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R Per O. P. Meena, Am: 1. The Above Captioned Two Appeal By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Valsad [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 06.09.2017 & 20.05.2019 Pertaining To Assessment Year 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively, Which In Turn Has Arisen From The Separate Assessment Orders Passed Under Section 143 (3) Read With Section 147 Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) By The Income Tax Officer, Ward- -3, Valsad (In Short “The Ao”).

Section 143Section 147Section 148

cash deposits in bank account. In view of these facts, the above-cited decisions are distinguishable on fact and in law hence, the ratio of the same is not applicable. Further, in the case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO[1999] 236 ITR 34 (SC), the Hon`ble Supreme Court held that in determining whether commencement of reassessment

SHRI HARSHADBHAI VALLABHBHAI PATEL,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, VALSAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 356/SRT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.194/Srt/2017 & 356/Srt/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 Shri Harshadbhai Vallabhai V. Income Tax Officer, Patel , Ward- 3, Valsad At & Post Tighra, Nava Falia, Via- Dungari Valsad 393 375 Pan: [Afspp 8443 F] अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Rajesh M. Upadhyay, Itp िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Mrs. Anupama Singla, Sr.D.R. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By 09.12.2019 सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing 10.12.2019 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R Per O. P. Meena, Am: 1. The Above Captioned Two Appeal By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Valsad [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 06.09.2017 & 20.05.2019 Pertaining To Assessment Year 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively, Which In Turn Has Arisen From The Separate Assessment Orders Passed Under Section 143 (3) Read With Section 147 Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) By The Income Tax Officer, Ward- -3, Valsad (In Short “The Ao”).

Section 143Section 147Section 148

cash deposits in bank account. In view of these facts, the above-cited decisions are distinguishable on fact and in law hence, the ratio of the same is not applicable. Further, in the case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO[1999] 236 ITR 34 (SC), the Hon`ble Supreme Court held that in determining whether commencement of reassessment

MUKHTAR RAMZAN SHAIKH,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6, VAPI, VAPI

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 628/SRT/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Dec 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.628 & 629/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2010-11 & 2011-12) (Physical Hearing) Mukhtar Ramzan Shaikh Income Tax Officer, 303, Imran Mension, Opp. Vs. Ward-6, Vapi, Income Tax Office, Suman Auto, Godal Nagar, Room No.808, Fortune Saquare- Vapi-396191 Ii, Daman Road, Chala Vapi- 396191 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Awlps 0991 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69ASection 80C

deposit of cash of Rs.14,55,000/- in the bank account. In response to same, I submit that since I am regularly filing the return of income and hence the re-opening of the case is not valid and I respectfully object the same. I am enclosing herewith following documents for your goodself kind consideration- a. Copy of acknowledgment