SHRI VIJESH PRITAMSINGH JAMADAR,BHARUCH vs. THE ACIT.,CENT.CIRCLE-2,, BARODA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby by partly allowed
ITA 749/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Nov 2019AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm & Shri O.P.Meena, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 748/Ahd/2011 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2007-08) Shri Babubhai Pritamsingh बिधम/ The Acit, Central Circle-2, Baroada. Jamadar Vs. Dandia Bazar, Bharuch (Gujarat). Pan: Acapj5829N आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 749/Ahd/2011 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2007-08) Shri Vijesh Pritamsingh बिधम/ The Acit, Central Circle-2, Baroda. Jamadar Vs. Dandia Bazar, Bharuch (Gujarat). Pan:Achpj7661F आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 750/Ahd/2011 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2007-08) बिधम/ Shri Mehmoodbhai Pritamsingh The Acit, Central Circle-2, Baroda. Jamadar Vs. Dandia Bazar, Bharuch (Gujara). Pan/Gir No. : Acapj5828D आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 55/Ahd/2014 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2007-08) Shri Vijesh Pritamsingh बिधम/ The Ito Ward-4 Jamadar Bharuch Vs. Dandia Bazar, Bharuch (Gujarat). Pan:Achpj7661F आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 56/Ahd/2014 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2007-08) Shri Babubhai Pritamsingh बिधम/ The Ito Ward-4 Jamadar Bharuch. Vs. Dandia Bazar, Bharuch (Gujarat). Pan: Acapj5829N आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 400/Ahd/2014 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2007-08) बिधम/ Shri Mehmood P. Jamadar The Ito Ward-4 Dandia Bazar, Bharuch Bharuch. Vs. (Gujara). स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Acapj5828D (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri B. T. ThakkarFor Respondent: Shri Mayank Pandey (Sr. DR)
Section 143(2)Section 69B
section 69B are not applicable and that there is no unexplained investment made by assessee.
3. That on facts and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the addition of Rs.49,28,966/- öut of addition of Rs.65,16,197/- made by the AO, towards alleged unexplained investment u/s 69B of the Act.
4. The appellant