Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi24 Indore14 Ahmedabad12 Jaipur10 Agra7 Surat6 Mumbai5 Pune4 Patna2 Hyderabad2 Allahabad1 Bangalore1 Jabalpur1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 54B24 Section 271(1)(c)10 Section 143(3)5 Penalty5 Section 271(1)4 Deduction4 Addition to Income4 Exemption4 Section 143(2)3 Section 50C

MAYUR MATHURDAS PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(7), SURAT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees (in ITA No

ITA 698/SRT/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jul 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.697 & 698/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kabra - ARFor Respondent: Ms Anupama Singla – Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. She argues that voluntary disclosure does not lead to assessee being free from mischief of penal proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. She contends that assessee has claimed deduction under section 54B

MAYUR MATHURDAS PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(7), SURAT

MAYUR MATHURDAS PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(7), SURAT

SHRI VIJAYSING P. SOLANKI,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMM. OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -3(1), SURAT

KRISTINA NATHABHAI KRICHCHAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

SUKHABHAI DAYALBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(6), SURAT

LABHU BALUBHAI GHEVARIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(4), SURAT