Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 32Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai61 Delhi5 Pune3 Bangalore1 Chandigarh1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 2635 Section 14A5 Section 143(3)2 Section 10(38)2

AALIDHARA TEXTOOL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD,SURAT vs. PCIT-1, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 94/SRT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 May 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.94/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Alidhara Textool Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Pcit-1, Surat. Plot No.168, Udhyog Nagar Road, Udhna, Surat -394210. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacd8469M (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Mishra, CIT(DR)

Section 10Section 10(38)Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

32A on certain fixed assets was erroneous. The Honourable Gujarat HC held that "once the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the assessee's claim on certain fixed assets, the order of the Assessing Officer stood merged with that of the Commissioner (Appeals) and hence, no part of the order of the Assessing Officer could have been revised by the Commissioner under