VANMALIBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL L/H RANJANBEN DEEPAKBHAI PATEL,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD 5, NAVSARI
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 345/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Dec 2025AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.345/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Hybrid Hearing) Vanmalibhai Muljibhai Patel, Vs. Ito, L/H Of Ranjanben Deepakbhai Patel Ward - 5, 16, Shrinikunj Society, Ashabaug, Navsari Navsari - 396445 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abjpp3114G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant By Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By Ms. Jayshree Thakur, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/12/2025
Section 127Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 250Section 251(1)Section 271(1)(c)
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Act was also separately initiated.
4. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The appellant raised various grounds of appeal before the CIT(A), which are at pages 2 of the appellate order. The CIT(A) reproduced the submission of the appellant, which
