BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Indore47Chennai44Mumbai32Surat28Cuttack16Bangalore14Jaipur10Kolkata6Visakhapatnam6Rajkot6Delhi4Jabalpur3Chandigarh3Pune3Ahmedabad2Nagpur2Allahabad2Raipur2Guwahati1Cochin1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)126Section 142(1)69Section 143(3)31Penalty28Section 153A21Section 27413Section 14413Section 272A(1)(d)11Section 254(1)

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 363/SRT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

8
Search & Seizure7
Limitation/Time-bar7

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 364/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 367/SRT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 366/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 365/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 368/SRT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

M/S. SHREE GRANITE,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

ITA 362/SRT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367 & 368/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) M/S Shree Granite, D.C.I.T., R.S. No. 196, Block No. 161, Central Circle-2 & 3, Vs. Paiki-4, Opp. Dahima Nagar, Surat. Near Subhash Garden, Dandi Road, Jhangirabad, Surat-395005. Pan No. Aazfs 9929 S Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

U/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. It is therefore prayed that the above penalty may please be deleted as learned members of the tribunal may deem it proper. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Brief facts

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 635/SRT/2023[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 637/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 631/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 632/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 633/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 634/SRT/2023[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 636/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Surat21 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.631 To 637/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Viraj Shirishkumar Modi, Vs. The Dcit, 5, Dwarkadhish Society, Palanpur Patia, Central Circle – 1, Rander Road, Surat – 395009. Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bdbpm7942L (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Appellant By Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2023

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: These are the seven appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2012-13 to 2018-19, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 108/SRT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.106 To 110/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2013-14 To 2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Ramabhai Kanjibhai Patel, Vs. The Dcit, At-Surajpuja, Po-Surajpura, Ta-Palanpur, Central Circle-2, Palanpur-385001. Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aefpp4997J (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, AM: There are the five appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2013-14 to 2017-18, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 109/SRT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.106 To 110/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2013-14 To 2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Ramabhai Kanjibhai Patel, Vs. The Dcit, At-Surajpuja, Po-Surajpura, Ta-Palanpur, Central Circle-2, Palanpur-385001. Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aefpp4997J (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, AM: There are the five appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2013-14 to 2017-18, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 106/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.106 To 110/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2013-14 To 2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Ramabhai Kanjibhai Patel, Vs. The Dcit, At-Surajpuja, Po-Surajpura, Ta-Palanpur, Central Circle-2, Palanpur-385001. Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aefpp4997J (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, AM: There are the five appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2013-14 to 2017-18, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 107/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.106 To 110/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2013-14 To 2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Ramabhai Kanjibhai Patel, Vs. The Dcit, At-Surajpuja, Po-Surajpura, Ta-Palanpur, Central Circle-2, Palanpur-385001. Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aefpp4997J (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, AM: There are the five appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2013-14 to 2017-18, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 110/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.106 To 110/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2013-14 To 2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Ramabhai Kanjibhai Patel, Vs. The Dcit, At-Surajpuja, Po-Surajpura, Ta-Palanpur, Central Circle-2, Palanpur-385001. Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aefpp4997J (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, AM: There are the five appeals, filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2013-14 to 2017-18, are directed against the separate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Surat [in short “the ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 405/SRT/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

E R PER BENCH: This is the bunch of seven appeals filed by the same assessee, pertaining to different assessment years, all are directed against the orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax [in short ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] which is in turn arise out of separate penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer under section 271