Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1489 Penalty7 Addition to Income7 Section 1476 Section 254(1)5 Section 234A5 Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 143(3)4 Section 69A4

SADIK DAUDBHAI NANDOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 889/SRT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Jigar Adhiyaru, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. DR

Section 143Section 271(1)(b)Section 44ASection 69Section 69A

penalty proceedings as initiated u/s 271(1)(b), 271(1)(c) & 271Fof the Act being unlawful and devoid of any merit kindly be quashed. Sadik Daudbhai Nandoliya vs. ITO Asst. Year –2012-13 - 3– 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in charging interest u/s 234A

SADIK DAUDBHAI NANDOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), BHARUCH

SADIK DAUDBHAI NANDOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), BHARUCH

LIGI BIJU KODDASARY,VAPI vs. ITO, WARD-5, VAPI, VAPI

SHREE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BHARUCH

SHREE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BHARUCH

SHREE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BHARUCH

KETAN NATVARLAL SHAH,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SURAT

SHRI GORDHANBHAI R. ASODARIA,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURAT