Search: penalty u/s 271

9 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Penalty9 Addition to Income9 Section 234A8 Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 69A7 Section 254(1)6 Section 1475 Section 143(3)5 Section 1484 Disallowance

SADIK DAUDBHAI NANDOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 889/SRT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Jigar Adhiyaru, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. DR

Section 143Section 271(1)(b)Section 44ASection 69Section 69A

penalty proceedings as initiated u/s 271(1)(b), 271(1)(c) & 271Fof the Act being unlawful and devoid of any merit kindly be quashed. Sadik Daudbhai Nandoliya vs. ITO Asst. Year –2012-13 - 3– 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in charging interest u/s 234A

SADIK DAUDBHAI NANDOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), BHARUCH

SADIK DAUDBHAI NANDOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), BHARUCH

LIGI BIJU KODDASARY,VAPI vs. ITO, WARD-5, VAPI, VAPI

SHREE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BHARUCH

SHREE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BHARUCH

SHREE NARMADA KHAND UDYOG SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,NARMADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), BHARUCH

GANI MOHAMMAD POPAT,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3, VAPI

SHRI GORDHANBHAI R. ASODARIA,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURAT

JAYENDRASINH BHIKHUBHAI SOLANKI,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- SILVASSA, SILVASSA

ABDUL IBRAHIM PATEL,BHARUCH vs. ITO WARD 1(4) BHARUCH (CURRENTLY, ITO WARD 1(1) BHARUCH), BHARUCH