BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi277Mumbai211Karnataka124Chennai110Jaipur78Indore35Calcutta34Raipur33Bangalore29Kolkata28Ahmedabad22Chandigarh22Pune21Hyderabad18Allahabad17Visakhapatnam11Lucknow8Surat8Nagpur4Rajkot4Amritsar3Rajasthan2Ranchi2Agra1Cochin1Telangana1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 14820Section 271(1)(b)10Section 271C7Penalty7Addition to Income7Section 142(1)6Section 254(1)5Section 271F5Section 147

PANKAJKUMAR SEVANTILAL PARMAR,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, five appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 205/SRT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

271(1)(b) of the Act and ITA No.214/SRT/2021 relates to penalty levied under section 271F of the Act. In all appeals, facts are common, the Ld. NFAC/ CIT(A) passed ex parte order ITA Nos.205,206, 212-214/SRT/2021 (A.Y10-11) Pankajkumar S Parmar dismissing the appeal in limine. Therefore, all appeals with the consent of parties, all are clubbed

5
Section 143(2)5
Cash Deposit5

PANKAJKUMAR SEVANTILAL PARMAR,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, five appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/SRT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

271(1)(b) of the Act and ITA No.214/SRT/2021 relates to penalty levied under section 271F of the Act. In all appeals, facts are common, the Ld. NFAC/ CIT(A) passed ex parte order ITA Nos.205,206, 212-214/SRT/2021 (A.Y10-11) Pankajkumar S Parmar dismissing the appeal in limine. Therefore, all appeals with the consent of parties, all are clubbed

PANKAJKUMAR SEVANTILAL PARMAR,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, five appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/SRT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

271(1)(b) of the Act and ITA No.214/SRT/2021 relates to penalty levied under section 271F of the Act. In all appeals, facts are common, the Ld. NFAC/ CIT(A) passed ex parte order ITA Nos.205,206, 212-214/SRT/2021 (A.Y10-11) Pankajkumar S Parmar dismissing the appeal in limine. Therefore, all appeals with the consent of parties, all are clubbed

PANKAJKUMAR SEVANTILAL PARMAR,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, five appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 206/SRT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

271(1)(b) of the Act and ITA No.214/SRT/2021 relates to penalty levied under section 271F of the Act. In all appeals, facts are common, the Ld. NFAC/ CIT(A) passed ex parte order ITA Nos.205,206, 212-214/SRT/2021 (A.Y10-11) Pankajkumar S Parmar dismissing the appeal in limine. Therefore, all appeals with the consent of parties, all are clubbed

PANKAJKUMAR SEVANTILAL PARMAR,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, five appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 212/SRT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

271(1)(b) of the Act and ITA No.214/SRT/2021 relates to penalty levied under section 271F of the Act. In all appeals, facts are common, the Ld. NFAC/ CIT(A) passed ex parte order ITA Nos.205,206, 212-214/SRT/2021 (A.Y10-11) Pankajkumar S Parmar dismissing the appeal in limine. Therefore, all appeals with the consent of parties, all are clubbed

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1220/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1220/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Hearing) Rahul Coal India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Addl. Cit (Tds), 429-432 Golden Point, Ring Road, Surat, Nr. Bsnl Office, Surat-395 002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabcr1044D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2025

Section 133ASection 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 250Section 271CSection 271C(1)(a)

206(6&6A) r.w.s. 206C(7) of the Act later on 11.02.2019 and intimated the Addl. CIT, TDS on 11.02.2019 to initiate penalty u/s 271C(1)(a) of the Act. Resultantly, the Addl. CIT, TDS issued notices u/s 271CA on 26.08.2021, 13.10.2021 and 27.01.2022. The appellant received said notice on 13.10.2021 through mail and replied that there was no failure

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. S D MATERIAL HANDLERS PRIVATE LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 499/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.499/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Hybrid Hearing) Assistant Commissioner Of M/S S D Material Handlers Pvt. Ltd. Income-Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Surat Vs. 405-408, Shivalik Western, L.P. Room No.612, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Savani Road, Adajan Adajan Bhavan, Near Majura Gate, Bo, Surat-395009 Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccd 3481B (अपीलाथ" /Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sapnesh R Sheth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)

271/-. The Ld.PCIT-2, Surat vide his order dated 19.03.2018, has set aside the case u/s 263 to the file of Assessing Office for making fresh enquiry. Therefore, a notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 19.07.2018, with a specific questionnaire and asked the assessee to submit its reply on 27.07.2018. In response to the notices issued, assessee furnished documents

DIVYABEN PRAFULCHANDRA PARMAR,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 73/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.73/Srt/2023 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) (Physical Hearing) Divyaben Prafulchand Parmar, Vs. The Ito, Ward-1(3)(1), 1-2, Harikrishna Niwas, B/H Braham Surat. Kumari Ashram, Bhatar Road, Surat – 395017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acbpp9559Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 68Section 69

Penalty etc. on my shoulders. I humbly submit that the impugned order is high pitched order and is also arbitrary.” 4. Apart from this, ld Counsel also submitted that entire delay has resulted due to mistake of assessee`s Tax Consultant, Shri Pradip Gohil, who has not checked the order of ld CIT(A) in the e-portal of Income