Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 202clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai82 Delhi75 Rajkot27 Jaipur27 Raipur19 Bangalore15 Chennai15 Kolkata10 Hyderabad10 Panaji10 Ahmedabad7 Surat7 Pune6 Chandigarh6 Nagpur5 Indore3 Allahabad2 Ranchi2 Visakhapatnam1 Cochin1 Patna1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 1487 Addition to Income7 Section 2504 Penalty4 Section 143(3)3 Section 69C3 Section 41(1)3 Section 1443

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 584/SRT/2023[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Surat01 Nov 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 144Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)] (Hybrid hearing) Basant Sekhani, I.T.O., 202, Matru Ashish, Kazis, Gopipura, Ward-2(2)(1), Vs. Surat, Gujarat-395001. Surat. PAN No. AVOPS 2826 F Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Ms. Chaitali Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of institution of appeals 25/08/2023 Date of hearing 01/11/2023 Date

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(6), SURAT, ADAJAN vs. DIAM INTERNATIONAL, MAHIDHARPURA

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(6), SURAT, ADAJAN vs. DIAM INTERNATIONAL, MAHIDHARPURA

M/S DIAM INTERNATIONAL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(7), SURAT

DINESHBHAI MULACHANDABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(1), SURAT

SHRI FARSURAM RATILAL BHAMWALA,,BHARUCH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, BHARUCH