Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 201(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)16 Section 80I16 Section 2717 Section 271C7 Penalty6 Disallowance5 Section 195(6)3 Section 10(5)3 Section 143(3)3

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 146/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.146/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Hearing) Raj Kishore Prasad, Vs. The Ito, 201, 2Nd Floor, Devashish Complex, Ward-3, Nr. Regenta Central Antarim Hotel, Valsad Off Cg Road, Ahmedabad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aitpp0535A (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 10(5)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

271(1) (c ) of the Act of Rs. 65,060/- should be deleted. ITA.146/SRT/2023/AY.2012-13 Raj Kishore Prasad 14. I note that for AY.2012-13 to 2014-15 in ITA No.1660 to 1666/Ahd/2017 for AYs.2012-13 to 2014-15, in case of State Bank of India vs ITO (TDS), the penalty under section 271C, on account of non- deduction of tax from

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

HETAL RAMANLAL SHAH,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), SURAT

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

HETAL RAMANLAL SHAH,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), SURAT

ACIT, CIRCLE-3(2), SURAT vs. M/S. VINAY DIAMONDS, SURAT

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), SURAT vs. M/S. K. G. DEVELOPERS, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), SURAT vs. M/S. K. G. DEVELOPERS, SURAT

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. S D MATERIAL HANDLERS PRIVATE LIMITED, SURAT