Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi170 Mumbai152 Bangalore53 Ahmedabad35 Chandigarh33 Jaipur30 Raipur27 Kolkata17 Chennai14 Indore13 Pune11 Amritsar10 Hyderabad8 Lucknow8 Surat5 Cochin4 Allahabad3 Nagpur2

Key Topics

Section 27115 Section 195(6)10 Penalty5 Section 1953 Section 2502 Section 2742 Addition to Income2

AKSHAR GEMS,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.3(2), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 24/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.24/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Virtual Court Hearing) Akshar Gems, Assistant Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, Shreeji Diamond Apartment, Vs. Income-Tax, Circle-3(2), Nandu Doshi Ni Wadi, Vastadevdi Road, Aaykar Bhavan Nr.Majura Katargam, Surat – 395004 Gate, Opp. New Civil Hospital, Surat-395001 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aarfa3697A Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27/12/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 30/01/2023

Section 195Section 195(6)Section 271Section 274

u/s 195 of the Act, Thus, the notice issued 274 r.w.s. u/s.271-I is bad in law as it does not specify which limb of section 271-I of the Act. In view of above, the penalty

AKSHAR GEMS,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.3(2), SURAT

AKSHAR GEMS,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.3(2), SURAT

ACIT, CIRCLE-3(2), SURAT vs. M/S. VINAY DIAMONDS, SURAT

SHRIRANG SALES CORPORATION,SURT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1(2), SURAT

GOPAL CHANDAK,SURAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), SURAT

LIGI BIJU KODDASARY,VAPI vs. ITO, WARD-5, VAPI, VAPI